Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== [[Rotten Tomatoes]], a [[review aggregator]], reports that 88% of 16 surveyed critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating was 6.5/10.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ginger_snaps_2_unleashed/|title=Ginger Snaps 2 - Unleashed (2004)|work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|date=13 April 2004 |accessdate=24 September 2022}}</ref> Dennis Harvey of ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' wrote that it "keeps most cliches at bay, and actually is less formulaic, even if storytelling and [performances] remain uneven".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2004/film/reviews/ginger-snaps-ii-unleashed-1200534018/|title=Review: 'Ginger Snaps II: Unleashed'|last=Harvey|first=Dennis|work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|date=2004-04-13|accessdate=2014-10-02|archive-date=2024-09-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240904205100/https://variety.com/2004/film/reviews/ginger-snaps-ii-unleashed-1200534018/|url-status=live}}</ref> Liam Lacey of ''[[The Globe and Mail]]'' wrote: "Though less original and satiric than the original, and more decorated with gore and prank scares, the movie maintains the previous film's mordant tone".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/ginger-snaps-ii-unleashed/article1126820/|title=Ginger Snaps II: Unleashed|last=Lacey|first=Liam|work=[[The Globe and Mail]]|date=2004-01-30|accessdate=2014-10-02|archive-date=2024-09-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240904205119/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/ginger-snaps-ii-unleashed/article1126820/|url-status=live}}</ref> Brad Miska of [[Bloody Disgusting]] rated it 2.5/5 stars and called it "a major letdown" that "is an enjoyable film, yet nothing to get all psyched about".<ref name=bloody/> [[Ernest Mathijs]], in his book ''John Fawcett's Ginger Snaps'', wrote that the sequel is "more radical and nihilist". He identifies the major themes as self-harm, drug addiction, and deconstruction of the themes explored in the first film.<ref>{{cite book|title=John Fawcett's Ginger Snaps|last=Mathijs|first=Ernest|publisher=[[University of Toronto Press]]|isbn=9781442615670|year=2013|pages=118β119|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RW-1AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA118}}</ref> === Accolades === {| class="sortable wikitable plainrowheaders awards-table" style="table-layout: fixed; margin-right: 0; " ! scope="col" |Year ! scope="col" |Award ! scope="col" |Category ! scope="col" |Nominee(s) ! scope="col" |Result ! scope="col" class="unsortable" |References |- ! rowspan="5" scope="row" |2005 | rowspan="5" |Fangoria Chainsaw Awards |Best Limited-Release/Direct-to-Video Film |''Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed'' | {{Won}} | rowspan="5" |<ref>{{Citation|title=Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - IMDb|url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0353489/awards|access-date=2020-07-27}}</ref> |- |Best Actress |Emily Perkins | {{Won}} |- |Best Supporting Actress |Tatiana Maslany | {{Won}} |- |Best Screenplay |Megan Martin | {{Nom}} |- |Best Score |Kurt Swinghammer | {{Nom}} |}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)