Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Guttman scale
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Reproducibility == In practice, perfect ("deterministic") Guttman scales are rare, but approximate ones have been found in specific populations with respect to attributes such as religious practices, narrowly defined domains of knowledge, specific skills, and ownership of household appliances.<ref name=":0">{{cite book|title=Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences|last1=Coombs|first1=Clyde|last2=Coombs|first2=Lolagene|last3=Lingoes|first3=James|publisher=San Francisco: Jossey-Bass|isbn=0-87589-379-1|editor-last=Shye|editor-first=Samuel|pages=280β298|chapter=Chapter 11: Stochastic Cumulative Scales|year=1978}}</ref> When data do not conform to a Guttman scale, they may either represent a Guttman scale with noise (and treated stochastically<ref name=":0" />), or they may have a more complex structure requiring multiple scaling for identifying the scales intrinsic to them. The extent to which a data set conforms to a Guttman scale can be estimated from the coefficient of reproducibility <ref name="Stouffer">Stouffer, S.A., Guttman, L., Suchman, E.A., Lazarsfeld, P.F., Star, S.A., Clausen, J.A. (1950) [https://academic.oup.com/sf/article/29/2/207/2225654 Measurement and Prediction] Princeton University Press</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Guttman|first=Louis|date=1944|title=A basis for scaling qualitative data|journal=American Sociological Review|volume=9|issue=2|pages=139β150|doi=10.2307/2086306|jstor=2086306}}</ref> of which there are a few versions, depending on statistical assumptions and limitations. Guttman's original definition of the reproducibility coefficient, C<sub>R</sub> is simply 1 minus the ratio of the number of errors to the number of entries in the data set. And, to ensure that there is a range of responses (not the case if all respondents only endorsed one item) the coefficient of scalability is used.<ref name="Menzel">Menzel, H. (1953) A new coefficient for scalogram analysis in Educational and ''Public Opinion Quarterly'' Volume: 15 issue: 2, page(s): 268-280</ref> In Guttman scaling is found the beginnings of [[item response theory]] which, in contrast to [[classical test theory]], acknowledges that items in [[questionnaires]] do not all have the same level of difficulty. Non-deterministic (i.e., stochastic) models have been developed such as the [[Mokken scale]] and the [[Rasch model]]. Guttman scale has been generalized to the theory and procedures of "multiple scaling" which identifies the minimum number of scales needed for satisfactory reproducibility. As a procedure that ties substantive contents with logical aspects of data, Guttman scale heralded the advent of facet theory developed by Louis Guttman and his associates.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)