Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Identifier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Ambiguity== ===Identifiers (IDs) versus Unique identifiers (UIDs)=== {{Main|Unique identifier}} A resource may carry multiple identifiers. Typical examples are: * One person with multiple names, nicknames, and forms of address (titles, salutations) ** ''For example:'' One specific person may be identified by all of the following identifiers: Jane Smith; Jane Elizabeth Meredith Smith; Jane E. M. Smith; Jane E. Smith; Janie Smith; Janie; Little Janie (as opposed to her mother or sister or cousin, Big Janie); Aunt Jane; Auntie Janie; Mom; Grandmom; Nana; Kelly's mother; Billy's grandmother; Ms. Smith; Dr. Smith; Jane E. Smith, PhD; and Fuzzy (her jocular nickname at work). * One document with multiple versions<ref name=paid>{{cite web | last = University of Glasgow | author-link = University of Glasgow | title = Procedure for Applying Identifiers to Documents | url = http://www.gla.ac.uk/infostrat/ERM/Docs/procref.htm | access-date = 28 April 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110605081415/http://www.gla.ac.uk/infostrat/ERM/Docs/procref.htm | archive-date = 5 June 2011 | url-status = dead }}</ref> * One substance with multiple names (for example, [[Chemical Abstracts Service|CAS]] index names versus [[IUPAC]] names;<ref name=icn>{{cite web | last = University of Pennsylvania | author-link = University of Pennsylvania | title = Information on Chemical Nomenclature | url = http://gethelp.library.upenn.edu/guides/scitech/chemnom.html | access-date = 28 April 2009 | archive-date = 4 January 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090104023819/http://gethelp.library.upenn.edu/guides/scitech/chemnom.html | url-status = dead }}</ref> [[International Nonproprietary Name|INN]] generic drug names versus [[United States Adopted Name|USAN]] generic drug names versus brand names) The inverse is also possible, where multiple resources are represented with the same identifier (discussed below). ===Implicit context and namespace conflicts=== {{see also|Naming collision}} Many [[code]]s and [[nomenclature|nomenclatural]] systems originate within a small [[namespace]]. Over the years, some of them bleed into larger namespaces (as people interact in ways they formerly had not, e.g., cross-border trade, scientific collaboration, military alliance, and general cultural interconnection or assimilation). When such dissemination happens, the limitations of the original naming convention, which had formerly been latent and moot, become painfully apparent, often necessitating [[retronym]]y, [[synonym]]ity, translation/[[transcoding]], and so on. Such limitations generally accompany the shift away from the original context to the broader one. Typically the system shows implicit context (context was formerly assumed, and narrow), lack of capacity (e.g., low number of possible IDs, reflecting the outmoded narrow context), lack of [[extensibility]] (no features defined and reserved against future needs), and lack of specificity and disambiguating capability (related to the context shift, where longstanding uniqueness encounters novel nonuniqueness). Within computer science, this problem is called [[naming collision]]. The story of the origination and expansion of the [[CODEN]] system provides a good case example in a recent-decades, technical-nomenclature context. The capitalization variations seen with [[proper noun#Specific designators|specific designators]] reveals an instance of this problem occurring in [[natural language]]s, where the proper noun/common noun distinction (and its complications) must be dealt with. A universe in which every object had a UID would not need any namespaces, which is to say that it would constitute one gigantic namespace; but human minds could never keep track of, or semantically interrelate, so many UIDs.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)