Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intuition
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Modern psychology=== In modern psychology, intuition can encompass the ability to know valid solutions to problems and the [[decision making|making of decisions]]. For example, the [[recognition-primed decision]] (RPD) model explains how people can make relatively fast decisions without having to compare options. [[Gary A. Klein|Gary Klein]] found that under time pressure, high stakes, and changing parameters, experts used their base of experience to identify similar situations and intuitively choose feasible solutions. The RPD model is a blend of intuition and analysis. The intuition is the pattern-matching process that quickly suggests feasible courses of action. The [[analysis]] is the mental simulation, a conscious and deliberate review of the courses of action.<ref>{{cite book|last=Klein|first=Gary|title=Intuition At Work|publisher=Random House|location=New York, N.Y.|date=January 2003}}{{page needed|date=August 2023}}</ref> [[Instinct]] is often misinterpreted as intuition. Its reliability is dependent on past knowledge and occurrences in a specific area.{{dubious|reason=isn't "instinct" typically used for actions that do not rely on past experience but are innate e.g. genetic?|date=August 2023}} For example, someone who has had more experience with children will tend to have better instincts about what they should do in certain situations with them. This is not to say that one with a great amount of experience is always going to have an accurate intuition.<ref>{{cite book|first=Eugene|last=Sadler-Smith|title=Inside Intuition|year=2008}}{{page needed|date=August 2023}}</ref> Intuitive abilities were quantitatively tested at Yale University in the 1970s. While studying [[nonverbal communication]], researchers noted that some subjects were able to read nonverbal facial cues before reinforcement occurred.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=A.J.|last1=Giannini|first2=J.|last2=Daood|first3=M.C.|last3=Giannini|first4=R.|last4=Boniface|first5=P.G.|last5=Rhodes|title=Intellect versus intuition--dichotomy in the reception of nonverbal communication|journal=Journal of General Psychology|volume=99|pages=19β24|year=1978|doi=10.1080/00221309.1978.9920890 }}</ref> In {{clarify|text=employing a similar design,|reason=were the subjects employing a design (what sort of design? employing how? similar to what?), or were the experimenters employing a similar experimental design to that of the previous study|date=August 2023}} they noted that highly intuitive subjects made decisions quickly but could not identify their rationale. Their level of accuracy, however, did not differ from that of non-intuitive subjects.<ref>{{cite journal|first1=A.J.|last1=Giannini|first2=M.E.|last2=Barringer|first3=M.C.|last3=Giannini|first4=R.H.|last4=Loiselle|title=Lack of relationship between handedness and intuitive and intellectual (rationalistic) modes of information processing|journal=Journal of General Psychology|volume=111|pages=31β37|year=1984|doi=10.1080/00221309.1984.9921094 }}</ref> According to the works of [[Daniel Kahneman]], intuition is the ability to automatically generate solutions without long logical arguments or evidence.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://univertv.ru/video/psihologiya/socialnaya_psihologiya/_issledovaniya_psihiki_intuiciya/?mark=science1 |title = Studies of the psyche: intuition |first = Daniel|last = Kahneman|language= en }}{{page needed|date=August 2023}}</ref> He mentions two different systems that we use when making decisions and judgements: the first is in charge of automatic or unconscious thoughts, the second in charge of more intentional thoughts.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Kahneman |first=Daniel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SHvzzuCnuv8C |title=Thinking, Fast and Slow |date=2011-10-25 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-374-27563-1 |language=en}}</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2023}} The first system is an example of intuition, and Kahneman believes people overestimate this system, using it as a source of confidence for knowledge they may not truly possess. These systems are connected with two versions of ourselves he calls the remembering self and experiencing self, relating to the creation of memories in "System 1".{{jargon inline|date=August 2023}} Its{{ambiguous|reason=what does "it" refer to, "system 1"? "these systems"? "the first system"?|date=August 2023}} automatic nature occasionally leads people to experience cognitive illusions, assumptions that our intuition gives us and are usually trusted without a second thought.<ref name=":0" />{{page needed|date=August 2023}} [[Gerd Gigerenzer]] described intuition as processes and thoughts that are devoid of typical logic. He described two primary characteristics to intuition: basic rules of thumb (that are heuristic in nature) and "evolved capacities of the brain".<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last=Gigerenzer |first=Gerd |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0ZKISEBHvYYC |title=Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious |year=2007 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-670-03863-3 |language=en}}</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2023}} The two work in tandem to give people thoughts and abilities that they do not actively think about as they are performed, and of which they cannot explain their formation or effectiveness. He does not believe that intuitions {{clarify|text=actively correlate to|reason=why "actively"? what does it mean for intuitions to "correlate to" knowledge?|date=August 2023}} knowledge; he believes that having too much information makes individuals overthink, and that some intuitions will actively defy known information.<ref name=":1" />{{page needed|date=August 2023}} Intuition is also seen as a figurative launch pad for logical thinking. Intuition's automatic nature tends to precede more thoughtful logic.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Haidt |first=Jonathan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ItuzJhbcpMIC |title=The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion |date=2012-03-13 |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |isbn=978-0-307-90703-5 |language=en}}</ref>{{page needed|date=August 2023}} Even when based on moral or subjective standpoints, intuition provides a baseβone that people will usually start to back up with logical thinking as a defense or justification rather than starting with a less biased viewpoint. The confidence in {{clarify|text=whether it is an intuition or not comes from how quickly they happen, because they|reason=what are "it" and "they" here?|date=August 2023}} are instantaneous feelings or judgments that we have surprising confidence in.<ref name=":2" />{{page needed|date=August 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)