Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Lexicographic order
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Cartesian products== The lexicographical order defines an order on an ''n''-ary [[Cartesian product]] of ordered sets, which is a total order when all these sets are themselves totally ordered. An element of a Cartesian product <math>E_1 \times \cdots \times E_n</math> is a sequence whose <math>i</math><sup>th</sup> element belongs to <math>E_i</math> for every <math>i.</math> As evaluating the lexicographical order of sequences compares only elements which have the same rank in the sequences, the lexicographical order extends to Cartesian products of ordered sets. Specifically, given two [[partially ordered set]]s <math>A</math> and <math>B,</math> the {{visible anchor|lexicographical order on the Cartesian product|Lexicographic order on Cartesian products}} <math>A \times B</math> is defined as <math display=block>(a, b) \leq \left(a^{\prime}, b^{\prime}\right) \text{ if and only if } a < a^{\prime} \text{ or } \left(a = a^{\prime} \text{ and } b \leq b^{\prime}\right),</math> The result is a partial order. If <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are each [[Total order|totally ordered]], then the result is a total order as well. The lexicographical order of two totally ordered sets is thus a [[linear extension]] of their [[product order]]. One can define similarly the lexicographic order on the Cartesian product of an infinite family of ordered sets, if the family is indexed by the [[natural number]]s, or more generally by a well-ordered set. This generalized lexicographical order is a total order if each factor set is totally ordered. Unlike the finite case, an infinite product of well-orders is not necessarily well-ordered by the lexicographical order. For instance, the set of [[countably infinite]] binary sequences (by definition, the set of functions from natural numbers to <math>\{ 0, 1 \},</math> also known as the [[Cantor space]] <math>\{ 0, 1 \}^{\omega}</math>) is not well-ordered; the subset of sequences that have precisely one <math>1</math> (that is, {{math|{ 100000..., 010000..., 001000..., ... }{{void}}}}) does not have a least element under the lexicographical order induced by <math>0 < 1,</math> because {{math|100000... > 010000... > 001000... > ...}} is an [[infinite descending chain]].<ref name="Harzheim">{{cite book|author=Egbert Harzheim|title=Ordered Sets|year=2006|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-0-387-24222-4|pages=88β89}}</ref> Similarly, the infinite lexicographic product is not [[Noetherian relation|Noetherian]] either because {{math|011111... < 101111... < 110111 ... < ...}} is an infinite ascending chain.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)