Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Literal and figurative language
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reddy and contemporary views== Beginning with the work of Michael Reddy in his 1979 paper "[[Conduit metaphor|The Conduit Metaphor]]", many linguists now deny that there is a valid way to distinguish between a "literal" and "figurative" mode of language.<ref name="Ortony1993">{{cite book |last=Ortony |first=Andrew |title=Metaphor and Thought |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QiJRvuXA_VcC&pg=PA204 |access-date=20 December 2012 |year=1993 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0521405614 |pages=204β}}</ref> Nevertheless, work has continued on making such a distinction.<ref> For example: {{cite book |last1 = Steen |first1 = Gerard J. |last2 = Dorst |first2 = Aletta G. |last3 = Herrmann |first3 = J. Berenike |last4 = Kaal |first4 = Anna |last5 = Krennmayr |first5 = Tina |last6 = Pasma |first6 = Tryntje |year = 2010 |title = A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=I6CLpwAACAAJ |series = Converging evidence in language and communication research, ISSN 1566-7774, volume 14 |publisher = John Benjamins Publishing Company |isbn = 9789027239044 |access-date = 2 May 2025 }} </ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)