Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
MAX Light Rail
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===South/North plan=== At the same time TriMet was planning the Westside MAX in the mid-1980s, [[Metro (Oregon regional government)|Metro]] regional government announced new light rail proposals for [[Clackamas County, Oregon|Clackamas County]]. Its planning committee—the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT)—proposed two separate routes that would have run between downtown Portland and [[Oregon City, Oregon|Oregon City]] via [[Milwaukie, Oregon|Milwaukie]] and between [[Portland International Airport]] and [[Clackamas Town Center]] via [[Interstate 205 (Oregon–Washington)|I-205]].<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Where's east side light rail going next? |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=April 3, 1986 |page=2}}</ref> Further planning led JPACT to favor the I-205 corridor due to an existing [[Right-of-way (property access)|right-of-way]] along the [[I-205 Transitway]], an unfinished mass transit component of the freeway that had been built to accommodate a busway.<ref>{{cite news |last=Briggs |first=Kara |title=Metro considers transit options along I-205 |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=July 24, 2002 |page=D2}}</ref><ref name="after-35-years">{{cite news |last=Redden |first=Jim |title=After 35 years of waiting, TriMet's Green Line hits all the parties: Thousands ride new I-205 line that was born of a '70s freeway rebellion |newspaper=Portland Tribune |date=September 10, 2009 |url=http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=125252833417516900 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110608052643/http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story.php?story_id=125252833417516900 |archive-date=June 8, 2011 |access-date=May 13, 2014}}</ref> TriMet, however, prioritized the Westside MAX during its bid for federal matching funds and the I-205 plans were put on hold.<ref>{{cite news |last=Kohler |first=Vince |title=Joint efforts of business, government could spur rail line; both groups need to finance, back line along I-205, panel says |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=May 23, 1988 |page=B5}}</ref> In 1989, studies for both I-205 and Milwaukie proposals received funding from the U.S. [[Senate Committee on Appropriations]] under the condition that they included potential route extensions to [[Clark County, Washington]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kohler |first1=Vince |last2=Stewart |first2=Bill |title=Light-rail proposals gain ground in Congress; senate panel approves transportation funding bill, aiding plans for new Oregon City, Vancouver lines |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=September 10, 1989 |page=C2}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Stewart |first=Bill |title=County light-rail project gains momentum |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=January 12, 1993 |page=B2}}</ref> Metro completed the studies in 1993, ultimately abandoning I-205 in favor of a route along the [[Interstate 5 (Oregon)|I-5]] and [[Willamette River]] corridors.<ref>{{cite news |last=Oliver |first=Gordon |title=Citizens advisory committee endorses pair of light-rail routes |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=March 11, 1993 |page=B3}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Oliver |first=Gordon |title=Decisions to be made soon on north–south light rail |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=March 7, 1993 |page=C4}}</ref> It finalized a single {{convert|25|mi|km|adj=on|abbr=out}} line from [[Hazel Dell, Washington]] south to Clackamas Town Center via Milwaukie,<ref>{{cite news |last=Leeson |first=Fred |title=Planners narrowing options for north–south light-rail line |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=February 13, 1994 |page=C5}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=McCarthy |first=Dennis |title=Light-rail service? On to Oregon City! |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=September 15, 1994 |page=D2}}</ref> which Metro and TriMet formally named the South–North Line.<ref name="Selinger"/>{{rp|80}} Metro said it adopted the name "South/North" instead of the more conventional "North/South" word order, at the request of representatives in the southern part of the corridor after the southern leg, which had long been planned to be the next-priority MAX corridor after the Westside line, was merged with the northern leg as a single proposed project.<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Ask the O (Q & A): Q:Why is the next phase of light rail being called 'South–North' instead of 'North–South', a more familiar use of the words? |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=December 1, 1994 }}</ref> In November 1994, 63% of Portland area voters passed a $475{{nbsp}}million [[ballot measure]] to fund Oregon's portion of the project.<ref name="Selinger"/>{{rp|80}} The following February, however, Clark County residents defeated a tax measure that would have funded Washington's share.<ref>{{cite news |last=Stewart |first=Bill |title=Clark County turns down north–south light rail |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=February 8, 1995 |page=A1}}</ref> To move the project forward, TriMet downsized the plan and abandoned the line's Clark County and North Portland segments up to the [[Rose Quarter]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Oliver |first1=Gordon |last2=Stewart |first2=Bill |title=MAX may skip Clark County, N. Portland |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=March 1, 1995 |page=B1}}</ref> That July, the [[Oregon House of Representatives]] approved a $750{{nbsp}}million transportation package, which included $375 million for the scaled-back line.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Green |first1=Ashbel S. |last2=Mapes |first2=Jeff |title=Legislature is finally working on the railroad |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=August 4, 1995 |page=A1}}</ref> The funding was annulled by the [[Oregon Supreme Court]] due to the inclusion of unrelated measures that violated the state's constitution.<ref name="light-rail-history">{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Some light-rail history |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=October 7, 1996 |page=A8}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Spicer |first=Osker |title=Light-rail would be good for areas |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=January 31, 1996 |page=C2}}</ref> The legislature met again in February 1996 and passed a revised $375{{nbsp}}million package,<ref name="light-rail-history"/> but light rail opponents forced a statewide vote and defeated it the following November.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Oliver |first1=Gordon |last2=Hunsberger |first2=Brent |title=Tri-Met still wants that rail line to Clackamas County |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=November 7, 1996 |page=D1}}</ref> A third proposal between Lombard Street in North Portland and Clackamas Town Center followed.<ref>{{cite news |last=Oliver |first=Gordon |title=South–north light-rail issue keeps on going |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=February 12, 1997 |page=A1}}</ref> This time, Metro and TriMet pursued the project without seeking contributions from either Clark County or the state, instead sourcing funds from Clackamas County and Portland. In 1998, TriMet placed a new ballot measure to reaffirm voter support for the $475{{nbsp}}million originally approved in 1994.<ref name="Selinger"/>{{rp|80}} The measure failed by 52% in November of that year, effectively canceling the proposed line.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Oliver |first1=Gordon |title=South–north line backers find themselves at a loss after election day defeat |newspaper=The Oregonian |date=November 7, 1998 |page=B1}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)