Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mathematical logic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 19th century === <!-- symbolic logic --> In the middle of the nineteenth century, [[George Boole]] and then [[Augustus De Morgan]] presented systematic mathematical treatments of logic. Their work, building on work by algebraists such as [[George Peacock (mathematician)|George Peacock]], extended the traditional Aristotelian doctrine of logic into a sufficient framework for the study of [[foundations of mathematics]].{{sfnp|Katz|1998|p=686}} In 1847, [[Vatroslav Bertić]] made substantial work on algebraization of logic, independently from Boole.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bertić, Vatroslav |url=https://www.enciklopedija.hr/clanak/bertic-vatroslav |access-date=2023-05-01 |website=www.enciklopedija.hr}}</ref> [[Charles Sanders Peirce]] later built upon the work of Boole to develop a logical system for relations and quantifiers, which he published in several papers from 1870 to 1885. [[Gottlob Frege]] presented an independent development of logic with quantifiers in his ''[[Begriffsschrift]]'', published in 1879, a work generally considered as marking a turning point in the history of logic. Frege's work remained obscure, however, until [[Bertrand Russell]] began to promote it near the turn of the century. The two-dimensional notation Frege developed was never widely adopted and is unused in contemporary texts. From 1890 to 1905, [[Ernst Schröder (mathematician)|Ernst Schröder]] published ''Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik'' in three volumes. This work summarized and extended the work of Boole, De Morgan, and Peirce, and was a comprehensive reference to symbolic logic as it was understood at the end of the 19th century. ==== Foundational theories ==== Concerns that mathematics had not been built on a proper foundation led to the development of axiomatic systems for fundamental areas of mathematics such as arithmetic, analysis, and geometry. <!-- arithmetic --> In logic, the term ''arithmetic'' refers to the theory of the [[natural number]]s. [[Giuseppe Peano]]{{sfnp|Peano|1889}} published a set of axioms for arithmetic that came to bear his name ([[Peano axioms]]), using a variation of the logical system of Boole and Schröder but adding quantifiers. Peano was unaware of Frege's work at the time. Around the same time [[Richard Dedekind]] showed that the natural numbers are uniquely characterized by their [[mathematical induction|induction]] properties. Dedekind proposed a different characterization, which lacked the formal logical character of Peano's axioms.{{sfnp|Dedekind|1888}} Dedekind's work, however, proved theorems inaccessible in Peano's system, including the uniqueness of the set of natural numbers (up to isomorphism) and the recursive definitions of addition and multiplication from the [[successor function]] and mathematical induction. <!-- geometry --> In the mid-19th century, flaws in Euclid's axioms for geometry became known.{{sfnp|Katz|1998|p=774}} In addition to the independence of the [[parallel postulate]], established by [[Nikolai Lobachevsky]] in 1826,{{sfnp|Lobachevsky|1840}} mathematicians discovered that certain theorems taken for granted by Euclid were not in fact provable from his axioms. Among these is the theorem that a line contains at least two points, or that circles of the same radius whose centers are separated by that radius must intersect. Hilbert{{sfnp|Hilbert|1899}} developed a complete set of [[Hilbert's axioms|axioms for geometry]], building on [[Pasch's axiom|previous work]] by Pasch.{{sfnp|Pasch|1882}} The success in axiomatizing geometry motivated Hilbert to seek complete axiomatizations of other areas of mathematics, such as the natural numbers and the [[real line]]. This would prove to be a major area of research in the first half of the 20th century. The 19th century saw great advances in the theory of [[real analysis]], including theories of convergence of functions and [[Fourier series]]. Mathematicians such as [[Karl Weierstrass]] began to construct functions that stretched intuition, such as [[Continuous, nowhere differentiable function|nowhere-differentiable continuous functions]]. Previous conceptions of a function as a rule for computation, or a smooth graph, were no longer adequate. Weierstrass began to advocate the [[arithmetization of analysis]], which sought to axiomatize analysis using properties of the natural numbers. The modern [[(ε, δ)-definition of limit]] and [[continuous function]]s was already developed by [[Bernard Bolzano|Bolzano]] in 1817,{{sfnp|Felscher|2000}} but remained relatively unknown. [[Cauchy]] in 1821 defined continuity in terms of [[infinitesimal]]s (see Cours d'Analyse, page 34). In 1858, Dedekind proposed a definition of the real numbers in terms of [[Dedekind cuts]] of rational numbers, a definition still employed in contemporary texts.{{sfnp|Dedekind|1872}} [[Georg Cantor]] developed the fundamental concepts of infinite set theory. His early results developed the theory of [[cardinality]] and [[Cantor's first uncountability proof|proved]] that the reals and the natural numbers have different cardinalities.{{sfnp|Cantor|1874}} Over the next twenty years, Cantor developed a theory of [[transfinite number]]s in a series of publications. In 1891, he published a new proof of the uncountability of the real numbers that introduced the [[Cantor's diagonal argument|diagonal argument]], and used this method to prove [[Cantor's theorem]] that no set can have the same cardinality as its [[powerset]]. Cantor believed that every set could be [[well-ordered]], but was unable to produce a proof for this result, leaving it as an open problem in 1895.{{sfnp|Katz|1998|p=807}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)