Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Michael Laws
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Resignation from Parliament === Laws had also been elected (in October 1995) as a [[Napier City Council|Napier city councillor]]. In that role, Laws awarded a contract to conduct a Napier City Council communications poll to a company part-owned by his wife. This appeared to contravene the Local Government (Members' Interests) Act 1968. Laws claimed "there had been no profit to either company or individuals," and an official inquiry by the [[Controller and Auditor-General of New Zealand|Auditor-General]] confirmed it found only a minor and unintentional breach of regulations in not declaring his wife's shareholding. However, Laws' conduct during the matter attracted strong criticism. Laws had claimed the poll had been carried out by a person named Antoinette Beck, who was supposedly based in Australia. It later became known Beck was not a real person, her signature had been applied by Laws' parliamentary secretary, and that the poll contract had been awarded to Laws' wife's company.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2010-02-01|title=Praise for Laws traced to his own firm|url=https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3260457/Praise-for-Laws-traced-to-his-own-firm|access-date=2021-05-20|website=[[Stuff (website)|Stuff]] |language=en}}</ref> After these facts emerged, Laws resigned both from Parliament and the council. Two of Laws' principal antagonists in the Antoinette Beck affair—Napier city councillors John Harrison and Kerry Single—unsuccessfully sued him for defamation. Laws defended himself in the Napier High Court in December 1997 and the Court awarded costs of over [[New Zealand dollar|NZ$]]200,000 against the joint plaintiffs.{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)