Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Minicomputer
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Mid-1980s and 1990s decline=== Minicomputer companies historically competed on the price and speed of their computers, instead of marketing and advertising.<ref name="pollack19840328">{{Cite news |last=Pollack |first=Andrew |date=1984-03-28 |title=A.T.&.T. OFFERS ITS COMPUTERS |language=en-US |pages=D1 |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1984/03/28/business/at-t-offers-its-computers.html |access-date=2023-02-14 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> By the early 1980s, the 16-bit minicomputer market had all but disappeared as newer 32-bit microprocessors began to improve in performance. Those customers who required more performance than these offered had generally already moved to 32-bit systems by this time. But it was not long before this market also began to come under threat; the [[Motorola 68000]] offered a significant percentage of the performance of a typical mini in a desktop platform. True 32-bit processors such as the [[National Semiconductor NS32016]], [[Motorola 68020]] and [[Intel 80386]] soon followed. By the mid-1980s, high-end microcomputers offered CPU performance equal to low-end and mid-range minis, and the new [[reduced instruction set computer|RISC]] approach promised performance levels well beyond the fastest minis, and even high-end mainframes. All that really separated micros from the mini market was storage and memory capacity. Both of these began to be addressed through the later 1980s; 1 MB of RAM became typical by around 1987, desktop [[hard drive]]s rapidly pushed past the 100 MB range by 1990, and the introduction of inexpensive and easily deployable [[local area network]] (LAN) systems provided solutions for those looking for multi-user systems. The introduction of [[workstation]]s opened new markets for graphics-based systems that the terminal-oriented minis could not even address. Minis remained a force for those using existing software products or those who required high-performance multitasking, but the introduction of newer [[operating system]]s based on [[Unix]] began to yield highly practical replacements for these roles as well. For [[computational science]], [[commodity computing|clusters of commodity PCs]] largely replaced minicomputers. Mini vendors began to rapidly disappear through this period. [[Data General]] responded to the changing market by focusing entirely on the high-performance [[server (computing)|file server]] market, embracing a role within large LANs that appeared resilient. This did not last; [[Novell NetWare]] rapidly pushed such solutions into niche roles, and later versions of [[Microsoft Windows]] did the same to Novell. [[Digital Equipment Corporation|DEC]] decided to move into the large-computer space instead, introducing the [[VAX 9000]] mainframe in 1989, but it was a flop in the market and disappeared after almost no sales. The company then attempted to enter the workstation and server markets with the [[DEC Alpha]], but was too late to save the company, and they eventually sold their remains to [[Compaq]] in 1998. By the end of the decade all of the classic vendors were gone; [[Data General]], [[Prime Computer|Prime]], [[Computervision]], [[Honeywell]], and [[Wang Laboratories|Wang]], failed, merged, or were bought out. Today, only a few proprietary minicomputer architectures survive. The [[IBM System/38]] operating system, which introduced many advanced concepts, lives on with IBM's [[AS/400]]. Great efforts were made by IBM to enable programs originally written for the [[IBM System/34]] and System/36 to be moved to the AS/400. After being rebranded multiple times, the AS/400 platform was replaced by [[IBM Power Systems]] running [[IBM i]]. In contrast, competing proprietary computing architectures from the early 1980s, such as DEC's [[VAX]], [[Wang VS]], and Hewlett-Packard's [[HP 3000]] have long been discontinued without a compatible upgrade path. [[OpenVMS]] was ported to HP [[DEC Alpha|Alpha]] and Intel [[IA-64]] ([[Itanium]]) CPU architectures, and now runs on [[x86-64]] processors. [[Tandem Computers]], which specialized in reliable large-scale computing, was acquired by [[Compaq]] in 1997, and in 2001 the combined entity merged with [[Hewlett-Packard]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Top-end server group comes home to HP |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/top-end-server-group-comes-home-to-hp/ |access-date=2023-02-28 |website=CNET |language=en}}</ref> The NonStop Kernel-based [[NonStop (server computers)|NonStop]] product line was re-ported from MIPS processors to Itanium-based processors branded as '[[HPE Integrity Servers|HP Integrity]] NonStop Servers'. As in the earlier migration from stack machines to MIPS microprocessors, all customer software was carried forward without source changes. The NSK operating system, now termed [[NonStop OS]], continues as the base software environment for the NonStop Servers, and has been extended to include support for [[Java (software platform)|Java]] and integration with popular development tools such as [[Microsoft Visual Studio|Visual Studio]] and [[Eclipse (software)|Eclipse]]. Later, Hewlett-Packard would split into HP and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise. The NonStop products and the DEC products would then be sold by HPE.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)