Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Network congestion
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Theory of congestion control=== {{unreferenced section|date=May 2013}} The theory of congestion control was pioneered by [[Frank Kelly (professor)|Frank Kelly]], who applied [[microeconomic theory]] and [[convex optimization]] theory to describe how individuals controlling their own rates can interact to achieve an ''optimal'' network-wide rate allocation. Examples of ''optimal'' rate allocation are [[Max-min fairness|max-min fair allocation]] and Kelly's suggestion of [[proportionally fair]] allocation, although many others are possible. Let <math>x_i</math> be the rate of flow <math>i</math>, <math>c_l</math> be the capacity of link <math>l</math>, and <math>r_{li}</math> be 1 if flow <math>i</math> uses link <math>l</math> and 0 otherwise. Let <math>x</math>, <math>c</math> and <math>R</math> be the corresponding vectors and matrix. Let <math>U(x)</math> be an increasing, strictly [[concave function]], called the [[utility]], which measures how much benefit a user obtains by transmitting at rate <math>x</math>. The optimal rate allocation then satisfies : <math>\max\limits_x \sum_i U(x_i)</math> : such that <math>Rx \le c</math> The [[Lagrange duality|Lagrange dual]] of this problem decouples so that each flow sets its own rate, based only on a ''price'' signaled by the network. Each link capacity imposes a constraint, which gives rise to a [[Lagrange multiplier]], <math>p_l</math>. The sum of these multipliers, <math>y_i=\sum_l p_l r_{li},</math> is the price to which the flow responds. Congestion control then becomes a distributed optimization algorithm. Many current congestion control algorithms can be modeled in this framework, with <math>p_l</math> being either the loss probability or the queueing delay at link <math>l</math>. A major weakness is that it assigns the same price to all flows, while sliding window flow control causes [[Burst transmission|burstiness]] that causes different flows to observe different loss or delay at a given link.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)