Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Open shop
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Legal status == ===United States=== The open shop is legal in the [[United States]]. Employers are under no legal compulsion to enter into union security agreements. The open shop is enforced in those states that have adopted [[right-to-work laws]]. In these states, employers are barred from enforcing union security arrangements and may not fire an employee for failure to pay union dues. ===Canada=== The term open shop is also used similarly in [[Canada]], mostly in reference to construction contractors that have at least a partially non-union workforce. Canadians enjoy the freedom to associate, guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, inherently including the right not to associate.<ref>Decided in a Quebec Supreme Court case ''[[R v Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd|R. v. Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd.]]'', in which eight of the nine judges concluded that the freedom to not associate was a logical corollary to the freedom of association.</ref> In various [[Provinces and territories of Canada|Canadian province]]s, certain 'open shop' organizations have formed. Many of these organizations claim that small contractors are not adequately protected by current labour legislation. As labour law is a provincial jurisdiction in Canada, the laws vary from province to province. However, there is some common ground. Despite opposition from open shop contractors, in Ontario, the Liberal government recently{{When|date=April 2021}} reinstituted the card-based certification system that was in place for most of the post-World War II period. Card-based certification was reinstated only for the construction industry. It allows workers to certify an exclusive bargaining agent on the basis of membership, sometimes known as "majority sign-up". Some observers claim that this system creates a risk of employees being misled by business agents. Others assert that it overcomes the natural advantage that employers in opposition to unionization have over their employees.<ref name="labourlawblog1">{{cite web | url=http://labourlawblog.typepad.com/managementupdates/2005/02/cardbased_versu.html | title=Thoughts from a Management Lawyer: Card-Based Versus Vote-Based Certification | access-date=August 24, 2012 |website=Labourlawblog.typepad.com| author=Fitzgibbon, Michael}}</ref> Some of these associations permit construction contractors that are unionized to join. Several companies whose employees are represented by the [[Christian Labour Association of Canada]] or [[CLAC]], a union with non-traditional rules of membership, are members of the association. CLAC's roots trace to the Christian labour movement in the Netherlands.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)