Editing Paragraph 175 (section)

==Weimar Republic==
{| border="0" align="right" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin:0px 0px 15px 30px; background:#F3F3FF"
|+''Table 2: Prosecutions under §&nbsp;175 (1919–1933)''<ref name="stats"/>
|-
!align="left" | Year
!colspan="3" align="center" | &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Charge&nbsp;
!valign="top" align="right" | Convictions
|-
|1919 || align="right" | 110&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;10 || align="center" | 89
|-
|1920 || align="right" | 237&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;39 || align="center" | 197
|-
|1921 || align="right" | 485&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;86 || align="center" | 425
|-
|1922 || align="right" | 588&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;7 || align="center" | 499
|-
|1923 || align="right" | 503&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;31 || align="center" | 445
|-
|1924 || align="right" | 850&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;12 || align="center" | 696
|-
|1925 || align="right" | 1225&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;111 || align="center" | 1107
|-
|1926 || align="right" | 1126&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;135 || align="center" | 1040
|-
|1927 || align="right" | 911&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;118 || align="center" | 848
|-
|1928 || align="right" | 731&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;202 || align="center" | 804
|-
|1929 || align="right" | 786&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;223 || align="center" | 837
|-
|1930 || align="right" | 723&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;221 || align="center" | 804
|-
|1931 || align="right" | 618&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;139 || align="center" | 665
|-
|1932 || align="right" | 721&nbsp;||/||&nbsp;204 || align="center" | 801
|-
|colspan="5" | <small>Middle column: Homosexuality / Bestiality</small>
|-
|}
There was a vigorous grassroots campaign against Paragraph 175 between 1919 and 1929, led by an alliance of the ''[[Gemeinschaft der Eigenen]]'' and the ''[[Wissenschaftlich-humanitäres Komitee]]''. But, much as during the time of the Empire, during the [[Weimar Republic]] the parties of the left failed to achieve the abolition of Paragraph 175, because they lacked a majority in the [[Reichstag (Weimar Republic)|Reichstag]].<ref name="Stumke 1989 p65">Stümke 1989, p.&nbsp;65</ref>

The plans of a center-[[right-wing politics|right]] regime in 1925 to increase the penalties of Paragraph 175 came closer to fruition; but they, too, failed. In addition to paragraph 296 (which corresponded to the old paragraph 175), their proposed reform draft provided for a paragraph 297 to be included. The plan was that so-called "qualified cases" such as homosexual [[prostitution]], sex with young men under the age of 21, and sexual coercion of a man in a service or work situation would be classified as "severe cases", reclassified as [[felony|felonies]] (''Verbrechen'') rather than [[misdemeanor]]s (''Vergehen''). This [[Act of Parliament|act]] would have pertained not only to homosexual intercourse but also to other homosexual acts such as, for example, [[mutual masturbation]].<ref name="Stumke 1989 p65"/>

[[File:§ 175 - Die Schmach des Jahrhunderts.jpg|thumb|Kurt Hiller: § 175 - Die Schmach des Jahrhunderts]]

Both new paragraphs grounded themselves in protection of [[public health]]:

<blockquote>It is to be assumed that it is the German view that sexual relationships between men are an aberration liable to wreck the character and to destroy moral feeling.  Clinging to this aberration leads to the degeneration of the people and to the decay of its strength.<ref name="Stumke 1989 p65"/></blockquote>

When this draft was discussed in 1929 by the judiciary committee of the Reichstag, the [[Social Democratic Party of Germany|Social Democratic Party]], the [[Communist Party of Germany|Communist Party]], and the left-wing liberal [[German Democratic Party]] at first managed to mobilize a majority of 15 to 13 votes against Paragraph 296. This would have constituted legalization of consensual homosexuality between adult men.<ref name="Duldung">{{cite book|title=Ablehnung – Duldung – Anerkennung|author1=Renate Loos |author2=Horst Lademacher |author-link2=Horst Lademacher |author3=Simon Groenveld |pages=697–702|isbn=978-3830961611|year=2015|publisher=Waxmann Verlag }}</ref> At the same time, a vast majority{{spaced ndash}}with only three KPD votes dissenting{{spaced ndash}}supported the introduction of the new Paragraph 297 (dealing with the so-called "qualified cases").<ref name="Duldung"/>

However, this partial success{{spaced ndash}}which the WhK characterized as "one step forward and two steps back"<ref name="Sex and Weimar">{{cite book|title=Sex and the Weimar Republic|pages=121–122|author=Laurie Marhoefer|isbn=978-1442626577|year=2015|publisher=University of Toronto Press }}</ref>{{spaced ndash}}came to nought. In March 1930, the ''Inter-Parliamentary Committee for the Coordination of Criminal Law Between Germany and Austria'', by a vote of 23 to 21, placed back Paragraph 296 in the reform package. But the latter was never passed, because during the last years of the Weimar Republic, the years of the ''[[Präsidialkabinette]]'', the parliamentary legislative process generally ground to a halt.<ref name="Duldung"/><ref name="Sex and Weimar"/>