Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pascal's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Proofs== Pascal's original note<ref name= orig/> has no proof, but there are various modern proofs of the theorem. It is sufficient to prove the theorem when the conic is a circle, because any (non-degenerate) conic can be reduced to a circle by a projective transformation. This was realised by Pascal, whose first lemma states the theorem for a circle. His second lemma states that what is true in one plane remains true upon projection to another plane.<ref name= orig/> Degenerate conics follow by continuity (the theorem is true for non-degenerate conics, and thus holds in the limit of degenerate conic). A short elementary proof of Pascal's theorem in the case of a circle was found by {{harvtxt|van Yzeren|1993}}, based on the proof in {{harv|Guggenheimer|1967}}. This proof proves the theorem for circle and then generalizes it to conics. A short elementary computational proof in the case of the real projective plane was found by {{harvtxt|Stefanovic|2010}}. We can infer the proof from existence of [[isogonal conjugate]] too. If we are to show that {{math|''X'' {{=}} ''AB'' β© ''DE''}}, {{math|''Y'' {{=}} ''BC'' β© ''EF''}}, {{math|''Z'' {{=}} ''CD'' β© ''FA''}} are collinear for concyclic {{math|''ABCDEF''}}, then notice that {{math|β³''EYB''}} and {{math|β³''CYF''}} are similar, and that {{math|''X''}} and {{math|''Z''}} will correspond to the isogonal conjugate if we overlap the similar triangles. This means that {{math|β ''CYX'' {{=}} β ''CYZ''}}, hence making {{math|''XYZ''}} collinear. A short proof can be constructed using cross-ratio preservation. Projecting tetrad {{math|''ABCE''}} from {{math|''D''}} onto line {{math|''AB''}}, we obtain tetrad {{math|''ABPX''}}, and projecting tetrad {{math|''ABCE''}} from {{math|''F''}} onto line {{math|''BC''}}, we obtain tetrad {{math|''QBCY''}}. This therefore means that {{math|''R''(''AB''; ''PX'') {{=}} ''R''(''QB''; ''CY'')}}, where one of the points in the two tetrads overlap, hence meaning that other lines connecting the other three pairs must coincide to preserve cross ratio. Therefore, {{math|''XYZ''}} are collinear. Another proof for Pascal's theorem for a circle uses [[Menelaus' theorem]] repeatedly. [[Germinal Pierre Dandelin|Dandelin]], the geometer who discovered the celebrated [[Dandelin spheres]], came up with a beautiful proof using "3D lifting" technique that is analogous to the 3D proof of [[Desargues' theorem]]. The proof makes use of the property that for every conic section we can find a one-sheet hyperboloid which passes through the conic. There also exists a simple proof for Pascal's theorem for a circle using the [[law of sines]] and [[Similarity (geometry)|similarity]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)