Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Patterns (film)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Critical response=== In a 2002 review on ''Ozus' World Movie Reviews'', film critic Dennis Schwartz gave the film an "A" grade and highly praised it, writing: :"''Patterns'' is based on the teleplay of Rod Serling which was aired live on TV in January of 1955 on [[Kraft Television Theatre|''Kraft Television Theatre'']], and was so-well received that it was repeated four weeks later. That was something not done during that period. This brilliant script by the creator of the ''[[The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series)|Twilight Zone]]'', Rod Serling, is considered by many as the finest piece of writing he has ever done and brought him instant acclaim. It is ably directed by Fielder Cook [...] The ensemble cast is superb, with special kudos to Van Heflin, Ed Begley, Beatrice Straight and Everett Sloane. This is Van Heflin's finest role since ''[[Shane (film)|Shane]]'' (1953)."<ref name=ds>{{cite web |last= Schwartz |first= Dennis |title= Ozus' World Movie Reviews |type= film review |date= September 27, 2002 |url= http://homepages.sover.net/~ozus/patterns.htm |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160305014446/http://homepages.sover.net/~ozus/patterns.htm |archive-date= 2016-03-05}}</ref> Added Schwartz: :"It's a forceful melodrama, that takes the viewer into the pits of a big corporation's board room politics, backstabbing, and the tough way of doing business. Things have changed since the 1950s which make some things outdated, but the film still has its finger on the savage nature of the business world. Even when a company is not as corrupt as an [[Enron]], people are still perceived as secondary to making a profit no matter what."<ref name=ds/> In the April 27, 2008, edition of ''[[TelevisionWeek|TVWeek]]'', the television critic [[Tom Shales]] compared the movie unfavorably to the live TV production: :Some people thought live TV was the beginning of a truly new storytelling medium—one uniquely suited to intimate, unadorned, psychological dramas—but it turned out to be a beginning with a tiny middle and a rushed end. [...] ''Patterns'' was so well-received that Kraft mounted a live repeat of the show a month later, and the intimate TV show was turned into a less intimate (and somehow less satisfying) movie in 1956. Except for the use of terms like “mimeographed” and “teletype,” little about the drama seems dated, unless one is of the opinion that corporate politics and boardroom bloodletting no longer exist. [...] With minimally judicious scene-setting (shots of clocks, a building directory, a switchboard) and a rapid introduction of characters, Serling pulls a viewer almost immediately into his story, a tale of corporate morality—or the lack of it—and such everyday battles as the ones waged between conscience and ambition.<ref>{{cite news |last= Shales |first= Tom |authorlink= Tom Shales |title= Serling's ''Patterns'' an Icon of Lost Era |date= April 27, 2008 |website= TVWeek |url= http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/04/serlings_patterns_an_icon_of_l.php |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100924052237/https://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/04/serlings_patterns_an_icon_of_l.php |archive-date= 2010-09-24 |url-status= dead}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)