Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pick's theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Other proofs=== Alternative proofs of Pick's theorem that do not use Euler's formula include the following. *One can recursively decompose the given polygon into triangles, allowing some triangles of the subdivision to have area larger than 1/2. Both the area and the counts of points used in Pick's formula add together in the same way as each other, so the truth of Pick's formula for general polygons follows from its truth for triangles. Any triangle subdivides its [[bounding box]] into the triangle itself and additional [[right triangle]]s, and the areas of both the bounding box and the right triangles are easy to compute. Combining these area computations gives Pick's formula for triangles, and combining triangles gives Pick's formula for arbitrary polygons.{{r|discretely|ball|varberg}} *Alternatively, instead of using grid squares centered on the grid points, it is possible to use grid squares having their vertices at the grid points. These grid squares cut the given polygon into pieces, which can be rearranged (by matching up pairs of squares along each edge of the polygon) into a [[polyomino]] with the same area.{{r|trainin}} *Pick's theorem may also be proved based on [[complex integration]] of a [[doubly periodic function]] related to [[Weierstrass's elliptic functions|Weierstrass elliptic functions]].{{r|diaz-robins}} *Applying the [[Poisson summation formula]] to the [[characteristic function]] of the polygon leads to another proof.{{r|bcrt}} Pick's theorem was included in a 1999 web listing of the "top 100 mathematical theorems", which later became used by Freek Wiedijk as a [[Benchmark (computing)|benchmark]] set to test the power of different [[proof assistant]]s. {{as of|2024}}, Pick's theorem had been formalized and proven in only two of the ten proof assistants recorded by Wiedijk.{{r|wiedijk}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)