Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Poisson summation formula
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Applicability== {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} holds provided <math>s(x)</math> is a continuous [[Lp space|integrable function]] which satisfies <math display="inline">|s(x)| + |S(x)| \le C (1+|x|)^{-1-\delta}</math> for some <math>C > 0,\delta > 0</math> and every <math>x.</math><ref name="Grafakos"/><ref name="Stein"/> Note that such <math>s(x)</math> is [[uniformly continuous]], this together with the decay assumption on <math>s</math>, show that the series defining <math>s_{_P}</math> converges uniformly to a continuous function. {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} holds in the strong sense that both sides converge uniformly and absolutely to the same limit.<ref name="Stein"/> {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} holds in a [[pointwise convergence|pointwise]] sense under the strictly weaker assumption that <math>s</math> has bounded variation and<ref name="Zygmund"/> <math display="block">2 \cdot s(x)=\lim_{\varepsilon\to 0} s(x+\varepsilon) + \lim_{\varepsilon\to 0} s(x-\varepsilon).</math> The Fourier series on the right-hand side of {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} is then understood as a (conditionally convergent) limit of symmetric partial sums. As shown above, {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} holds under the much less restrictive assumption that <math>s(x)</math> is in [[Lp space|<math>L^1(\mathbb{R})</math>]], but then it is necessary to interpret it in the sense that the right-hand side is the (possibly divergent) Fourier series of <math>s_{_P}(x).</math><ref name="Zygmund" /> In this case, one may extend the region where equality holds by considering summability methods such as [[Cesàro summation|Cesàro summability]]. When interpreting convergence in this way {{EquationNote|Eq.2}}, case <math>x=0,</math> holds under the less restrictive conditions that <math>s(x)</math> is integrable and 0 is a point of continuity of <math>s_{_P}(x)</math>. However, {{EquationNote|Eq.2}} may fail to hold even when both <math>s</math> and <math>S</math> are integrable and continuous, and the sums converge absolutely.<ref name="Katznelson" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)