Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Posting style
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Attribution lines=== Quoted material is often preceded by an ''attribution line'' that identifies its author. These lines are particularly helpful in discussions between multiple parties. For example: Nancy wrote: <span style="color:red">> Peter wrote:</span> <span style="color:blue">>> When will we have the performance figures?</span> <span style="color:red">> The tests will be completed next week. </span> Peter wrote: <span style="color:red">> Mary wrote:</span> <span style="color:blue">>> We should meet today to discuss the marketing strategy.</span> <span style="color:red">> Better wait, we do not have the West Coast sales data yet.</span> I agree with Peter. We need the sales data and also Nancy's performance figures. Let's meet next Friday after lunch. This reply quotes two messages, one by Nancy (itself a reply to Peter) and one by Peter (itself a reply to Mary). Many mail agents will add these attribution lines automatically to the top of the quoted material. Note that a newly added attribution line should not get the quotation marker, since it is not part of the quoted text; so that the level indicator of the attribution line is always one less than the corresponding text. Doing otherwise may confuse the reader and also e-mail interfaces that choose the text color according to the number of leading markers. Instead of an attribution line, one may indicate the author by a comment in brackets, at the beginning of the quotation: <span style="color:blue">>> [Peter:] When will we have the performance figures?</span> <span style="color:red">> [Nancy:] The tests will be completed next week. </span> <span style="color:blue">>> [Mary:] We should meet today to discuss the marketing strategy.</span> <span style="color:red">> [Peter:] Better wait, we do not have the West Coast sales data yet.</span> I agree with Peter. We need the sales data and Nancy's performance figures. Let's meet next Friday after lunch. Another alternative, used in [[Fidonet]] and some [[mail user agent]]s, is to place the initials of the author before the quoting marker. This may be used with or without attribution lines: Nancy wrote: <span style="color:red">N> Peter wrote:</span> <span style="color:blue">P>> When will we have the performance figures?</span> <span style="color:red">N> The tests will be completed next week. </span> Peter wrote: <span style="color:red">P> Mary wrote:</span> <span style="color:blue">M>> We should meet today to discuss the marketing strategy.</span> <span style="color:red">P> Better wait, we do not have the West Coast sales data yet.</span> I agree with Peter. We need the sales data and also Nancy's performance figures. Let's meet next Friday after lunch.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)