Editing Presentation (section)

== Assessing presentations ==
There lacks a comprehensive list of criteria common among research studies or educational institutions in a typical presentation rubric used to assess presentations.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Tsang|first=Art|date=March 2020|title=Enhancing Learners' Awareness of Oral Presentation (Delivery) Skills in the Context of Self-Regulated Learning|journal=Active Learning in Higher Education|volume=21|pages=39–50|doi=10.1177/1469787417731214|s2cid=149041859}}</ref> Nevertheless, De Grez et al., in consultation with experienced higher education teachers, developed a rubric composed of nine evaluative criteria, of which five dealt with one’s manner of delivery (interaction with audience, enthusiasm, eye contact, vocal delivery, and [[body language]]), three were content related (structure, quality of introduction, and conclusion), and one evaluated general professionalism.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=De Grez|first1=Luc|last2=Valcke|first2=Martin|last3=Roozen|first3=Irene|date=2012-06-28|title=How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers' assessments?|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284|journal=Active Learning in Higher Education|volume=13|issue=2|pages=129–142|doi=10.1177/1469787412441284|s2cid=145746375|issn=1469-7874|url-access=subscription}}</ref>