Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Principal ideal domain
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Properties== In a principal ideal domain, any two elements {{math|''a'',''b''}} have a [[greatest common divisor]], which may be obtained as a generator of the ideal {{math|(''a'', ''b'')}}. All [[Euclidean domain]]s are principal ideal domains, but the converse is not true. An example of a principal ideal domain that is not a Euclidean domain is the ring <math>\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1+\sqrt{-19}} 2\right]</math>,<ref>Wilson, Jack C. "A Principal Ring that is Not a Euclidean Ring." [[Math. Mag]] '''46''' (Jan 1973) 34-38 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2688577]</ref><ref>George Bergman, ''A principal ideal domain that is not Euclidean - developed as a series of exercises'' [http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/grad.hndts/nonEucPID.ps PostScript file]</ref> this was proved by [[Theodore Motzkin]] and was the first case known.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Motzkin |first=Th |date=December 1949 |title=The Euclidean algorithm |url=https://projecteuclid.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-mathematical-society/volume-55/issue-12/The-Euclidean-algorithm/bams/1183514381.full |journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]] |volume=55 |issue=12 |pages=1142–1146 |doi=10.1090/S0002-9904-1949-09344-8 |issn=0002-9904|doi-access=free }}</ref> In this domain no {{mvar|q}} and {{mvar|r}} exist, with {{math|0 ≤ {{!}}''r''{{!}} < 4}}, so that <math>(1+\sqrt{-19})=(4)q+r</math>, despite <math>1+\sqrt{-19}</math> and <math>4</math> having a greatest common divisor of {{math|2}}. Every principal ideal domain is a [[unique factorization domain]] (UFD).<ref>Proof: every prime ideal is generated by one element, which is necessarily prime. Now refer to the fact that an integral domain is a UFD if and only if its prime ideals contain prime elements.</ref><ref>Jacobson (2009), p. 148, Theorem 2.23.</ref><ref>Fraleigh & Katz (1967), p. 368, Theorem 7.2</ref><ref>Hazewinkel, Gubareni & Kirichenko (2004), [https://books.google.com/books?id=AibpdVNkFDYC&pg=PA166 p.166], Theorem 7.2.1.</ref> The converse does not hold since for any UFD {{math|''K''}}, the ring {{math|''K''[''X'', ''Y'']}} of polynomials in 2 variables is a UFD but is not a PID. (To prove this look at the ideal generated by <math>\left\langle X,Y \right\rangle.</math> It is not the whole ring since it contains no polynomials of degree 0, but it cannot be generated by any one single element.) #Every principal ideal domain is [[noetherian ring|Noetherian]]. #In all unital rings, [[maximal ideal]]s are [[prime ideal|prime]]. In principal ideal domains a near converse holds: every nonzero prime ideal is maximal. #All principal ideal domains are [[integrally closed domain|integrally closed]]. The previous three statements give the definition of a [[Dedekind domain]], and hence every principal ideal domain is a Dedekind domain. Let ''A'' be an integral domain, the following are equivalent. # ''A'' is a PID. # Every prime ideal of ''A'' is principal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://math.berkeley.edu/~mreyes/oka1.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100726160025/http://math.berkeley.edu/~mreyes/oka1.pdf|url-status=dead|title=T. Y. Lam and Manuel L. Reyes, A Prime Ideal Principle in Commutative Algebra|archive-date=26 July 2010|access-date=31 March 2023}}</ref> # ''A'' is a Dedekind domain that is a UFD. # Every finitely generated ideal of ''A'' is principal (i.e., ''A'' is a [[Bézout domain]]) and ''A'' satisfies the [[ascending chain condition on principal ideals]]. # ''A'' admits a [[Dedekind–Hasse norm]].<ref>Hazewinkel, Gubareni & Kirichenko (2004), [https://books.google.com/books?id=AibpdVNkFDYC&pg=PA170 p.170], Proposition 7.3.3.</ref> Any [[Euclidean function|Euclidean norm]] is a Dedekind-Hasse norm; thus, (5) shows that a Euclidean domain is a PID. (4) compares to: * An integral domain is a UFD if and only if it is a [[GCD domain]] (i.e., a domain where every two elements have a greatest common divisor) satisfying the ascending chain condition on principal ideals. An integral domain is a [[Bézout domain]] if and only if any two elements in it have a gcd ''that is a linear combination of the two.'' A Bézout domain is thus a GCD domain, and (4) gives yet another proof that a PID is a UFD.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)