Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Prostate-specific antigen
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Risk stratification and staging==== Men with prostate cancer may be characterized as low, intermediate, or high risk for having/developing metastatic disease or dying of prostate cancer. PSA level is one of three variables on which the risk stratification is based; the others are the grade of prostate cancer ([[Gleason grading system]]) and the stage of cancer based on physical examination and imaging studies. D'Amico criteria for each risk category are:<ref name="D'Amico-1998">{{cite journal | vauthors = D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A | title = Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer | journal = JAMA | volume = 280 | issue = 11 | pages = 969β974 | date = September 1998 | pmid = 9749478 | doi = 10.1001/jama.280.11.969 | doi-access = free }}</ref> :Low risk: PSA < 10, Gleason score β€ 6, AND clinical stage β€ T2a :Intermediate risk: PSA 10-20, Gleason score 7, OR clinical stage T2b/c :High risk: PSA > 20, Gleason score β₯ 8, OR clinical stage β₯ T3 Given the relative simplicity of the 1998 D'Amico criteria (above), other predictive models of risk stratification based on [[mathematical probability]] constructs exist or have been proposed to allow for better matching of treatment decisions with disease features.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Rodrigues G, Warde P, Pickles T, Crook J, Brundage M, Souhami L, Lukka H | title = Pre-treatment risk stratification of prostate cancer patients: A critical review | journal = Canadian Urological Association Journal | volume = 6 | issue = 2 | pages = 121β127 | date = April 2012 | pmid = 22511420 | pmc = 3328553 | doi = 10.5489/cuaj.11085 | doi-broken-date = 28 November 2024 }}{{dead link|date=November 2016}}</ref> Studies are being conducted into the incorporation of multiparametric [[MRI]] imaging results into [[nomogram]]s that rely on PSA, Gleason grade, and tumor stage.<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Sperling D | title = mpMRI improves the accuracy of the Partin tables and other nomograms|url=http://sperlingprostatecenter.com/mpmri-improves-the-accuracy-of-the-partin-tables-and-other-nomograms/|website=Sperling Prostate Center|access-date=31 March 2016}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)