Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Protein complex
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Transient vs permanent/stable protein complex === Transient protein complexes form and break down transiently ''in vivo'', whereas permanent complexes have a relatively long half-life. Typically, the obligate interactions (protein–protein interactions in an obligate complex) are permanent, whereas non-obligate interactions have been found to be either permanent or transient.<ref name = "Amoutzias_2010"/> Note that there is no clear distinction between obligate and non-obligate interaction, rather there exist a continuum between them which depends on various conditions e.g. pH, protein concentration etc.<ref name="pmid12853464">{{cite journal |vauthors=Nooren IM, Thornton JM | title = Diversity of protein interactions | journal = EMBO J. | volume = 22 | issue = 14 | pages = 3486–92 |date=July 2003 | pmid = 12853464 | pmc = 165629 | doi = 10.1093/emboj/cdg359 }}</ref> However, there are important distinctions between the properties of transient and permanent/stable interactions: stable interactions are highly conserved but transient interactions are far less conserved, interacting proteins on the two sides of a stable interaction have more tendency of being co-expressed than those of a transient interaction (in fact, co-expression probability between two transiently interacting proteins is not higher than two random proteins), and transient interactions are much less co-localized than stable interactions.<ref name="pmid17535438">{{cite journal |vauthors=Brown KR, Jurisica I | title = Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks | journal = Genome Biol. | volume = 8 | issue = 5 | pages = R95 | year = 2007 | pmid = 17535438 | pmc = 1929159 | doi = 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r95 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Though, transient by nature, transient interactions are very important for cell biology: the human interactome is enriched in such interactions, these interactions are the dominating players of gene regulation and signal transduction, and proteins with ''intrinsically disordered regions'' (IDR: regions in protein that show dynamic inter-converting structures in the native state) are found to be enriched in transient regulatory and signaling interactions.<ref name = "Amoutzias_2010"/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)