Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Radical centrism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Relations to the Third Way === In 1998, British sociologist [[Anthony Giddens]] claimed that the radical center is synonymous with the [[Third Way]].<ref>Giddens, Anthony (1998). ''The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy''. Polity Press, pp. 44β46. {{ISBN|978-0-7456-2267-5}}.</ref> For Giddens, an advisor to former British Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] and for many other European political actors, the Third Way is a reconstituted form of [[social democracy]].<ref name=Andrews /><ref>Giddens, Anthony (2000). ''The Third Way and Its Critics''. Polity Press, Chap. 2 ("Social Democracy and the Third Way"). {{ISBN|978-0-7456-2450-1}}.</ref> Some radical centrist thinkers do not equate radical centrism with the Third Way. In Britain, many do not see themselves as social democrats. Most prominently, British radical-centrist politician [[Nick Clegg]] has made it clear he does not consider himself an heir to Tony Blair<ref name=Stratton /> and [[Richard Reeves (British author)|Richard Reeves]], Clegg's longtime advisor, emphatically rejects social democracy.<ref name=Reeves>Reeves, Richard (19 September 2012). "[http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics/2012/09/case-truly-liberal-party The Case for a Truly Liberal Party]". ''The New Statesman'', p. 26. Retrieved 7 January 2013.</ref> In the United States, the situation is different because the term Third Way was adopted by the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] and other moderate Democrats.<ref>Smith, Ben (7 February 2011). "[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49041.html The End of the DLC Era]". ''Politico'' website. Retrieved 31 December 2016.</ref> However, most U.S. radical centrists also avoid the term. Ted Halstead and Michael Lind's introduction to radical centrist politics fails to mention it<ref>Halstead and Lind (2001), p. 263.</ref> and Lind subsequently accused the organized moderate Democrats of siding with the "center-right" and [[Wall Street]].<ref name=Lind/> Radical centrists have expressed dismay with what they see as "split[ting] the difference",<ref name=Klein/> "[[Triangulation (politics)|triangulation]]"<ref name=Lind/><ref>Burns, James MacGregor; Sorenson, Georgia J. (1999). ''Dead Center: Clinton-Gore Leadership and the Perils of Moderation''. Scribner, p. 221. {{ISBN|978-0-684-83778-9}}.</ref> and other supposed practices of what some of them call the "mushy middle".<ref>Satin (2004), p. ix.</ref><ref>Ray, Paul H.; Anderson, Sherry Ruth (2000). ''The Cultural Creatives: How 50 Million People Are Changing the World''. Harmony Books/Random House, pp. xiv and 336. {{ISBN|978-0-609-60467-0}}.</ref>{{#tag:ref|In 2010, radical centrist Michael Lind stated that "to date, [[Barack Obama|President Obama]] has been the soft-spoken tribune of the mushy middle".<ref name=Lind/>|group="nb"}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)