Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Reasonable doubt
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===United Kingdom=== In England and Wales, the modern practice often avoids the phrase “beyond reasonable doubt” in favor of telling jurors they must be “sure” of the defendant’s guilt. This rewording follows appeals court rulings expressing concern that the traditional formula might confuse jurors.<ref>[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2009/2563.html R v Majid] [2009] EWCA Crim 2563</ref> In ''Woolmington v DPP'' (1935), the House of Lords famously declared that there is a “golden thread” running through English criminal law: the burden of proof is on the prosecution at all times.<ref>''[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1935/1.html Woolmington v DPP] [1935] UKHL 1 (23 May 1935)''</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)