Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Representable functor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Analogy: Representable functionals == Consider a linear functional on a complex [[Hilbert space]] ''H'', i.e. a linear function <math>F: H\to\mathbb C</math>. The [[Riesz representation theorem]] states that if ''F'' is continuous, then there exists a unique element <math>a\in H</math> which represents ''F'' in the sense that ''F'' is equal to the inner product functional <math>\langle a, -\rangle </math>, that is <math>F(v) = \langle a,v\rangle </math> for <math>v\in H</math>. For example, the continuous linear functionals on the [[Square-integrable function|square-integrable function space]] <math>H = L^2(\mathbb R)</math> are all representable in the form <math>\textstyle F(v) = \langle a,v\rangle = \int_{\mathbb R} a(x)v(x)\,dx</math> for a unique function <math>a(x)\in H</math>. The theory of [[Distribution (mathematics)|distributions]] considers more general continuous functionals on the space of test functions <math>C=C^\infty_c(\mathbb R)</math>. Such a distribution functional is not necessarily representable by a function, but it may be considered intuitively as a generalized function. For instance, the [[Dirac delta function]] is the distribution defined by <math>F(v) = v(0)</math> for each test function <math>v(x)\in C</math>, and may be thought of as "represented" by an infinitely tall and thin bump function near <math>x=0</math>. Thus, a function <math>a(x)</math> may be determined not by its values, but by its effect on other functions via the inner product. Analogously, an object ''A'' in a category may be characterized not by its internal features, but by its [[Functor represented by a scheme|functor of points]], i.e. its relation to other objects via morphisms. Just as non-representable functionals are described by distributions, non-representable functors may be described by more complicated structures such as [[Stack (mathematics)|stacks]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)