Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Schenkerian analysis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Counterpoint, voice-leading=== Two-voice [[counterpoint]] remains for Schenker the model of strict writing. Free composition is a freer usage of the laws of strict counterpoint. One of the aims of the analysis is to trace how the work remains subject to these laws at the deepest level, despite the freedom taken at subsequent levels.<ref>Heinrich Schenker, ''Counterpoint'', vol. I, p. 12: "In the present day, when it is necessary to distinguish clearly between composition and that preliminary school represented by strict counterpoint, we must use the eternally valid of those rules for strict counterpoint, even if we no longer view them as applicable to composition".</ref> One aspect of strict, two-voice writing that appears to span Schenker's theory throughout the years of its elaboration is the rule of "fluent melody" (''fließender Gesang''), or "melodic fluency".<ref>N. Meeùs, "[http://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/orfeu/article/download/10538/7525 Schenker's ''fließender Gesang'' and the Concept of Melodic Fluency]", ''Orfeu'' 2/1, 2017, pp. 160–170.</ref> Schenker attributes the rule to [[Luigi Cherubini]], who would have written that "fluent melody is always preferable in strict counterpoint."<ref>''Counterpoint'', vol. I, p. 74. J. Rothgeb and J. Thym, the translators, quote Cherubini from the original French, which merely says that "conjunct motion better suits strict counterpoint than disjunct motion", but Schenker had written: ''der fliessende Gesang ist im strengen Stile immer besser as der sprungweise'' (''Kontrapunkt'', vol. I, p. 104) ("the fluent melody is always better in strict style than the disjunct one"). ''Fliessender Gesang'' not only appears in several 19th-century German translations of Cherubini, but is common in German counterpoint theory from the 18th century and might go back to Fux' description of the ''flexibili motuum facilitate'', the "flexible ease of motions" (''Gradus'', Liber secundus, Exercitii I, Lectio quinta) or even earlier. N. Meeùs, [http://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/orfeu/article/view/10538 Schenker's ''Fliessender Gesang'' and the Concept of Melodic Fluency], ''Orfeu'' 2/1 (2017), pp. 162–63.</ref> Melodic fluency, the preference for conjunct (stepwise) motion, is one of the main rules of [[voice leading]], even in free composition. It avoids successive leaps and produces "a kind of wave-like melodic line which as a whole represents an animated entity, and which, with its ascending and descending curves, appears balanced in all its individual component parts".<ref>''Counterpoint'', vol. I, p. 94.</ref> This idea is at the origin of that of [[linear progression]] (''Zug'') and, more specifically, of that of the Fundamental Line (''Urlinie'').
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)