Editing Single-wing formation (section)

==Single-wing style of play==
The direct snap or toss from the center usually went to the tailback or fullback. However, the quarterback could also take the ball. The tailback was very important to the success of the offense because he had to run, pass, block, and even punt. Unlike today, the quarterback usually blocked at the point of attack. As with his modern-day counterpart, a single-wing quarterback might also act as a field general by calling plays. The fullback was chosen for his larger size so that he could "buck" the line. This meant that the fullback would block or carry the ball between the defensive tackles. The wingback could double-team block with an offensive lineman at scrimmage or even run a pass route.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.footballhistorian.com/football_heroes.cfm?page=18|title=Football Historian - Football History, facts, stats, players, history}}</ref>

The single-wing formation was designed to place double-team blocks at the point of attack. Gaining this extra blocker was achieved in several ways. First, the unbalanced line placed an extra guard or tackle on one side of the center. Second, a wingback stationed outside end could quickly move to a crucial blocking position. Third, the fullback and especially the quarterback could lead the ball carrier producing interference. Finally, linemen, usually guards, would pull at the snap and block at the specified hole. Line splits were always close except for ends that might move out from the tackle.

The single-wing formation depended on a center who was skilled both at blocking and at tossing the ball from between his legs to the receiving back. The center had to direct the ball to any of several moving backs, with extreme accuracy, as the play started. Single-wing plays would not work well if the back had to wait for the snap because quick defensive penetration would overrun the play. The center was taught to direct the ball to give the tailback or fullback receiver a running start in the direction that the play was designed to go. 
<ref>{{cite book
  | last =Warner
  | first =Glenn
  | title =Football For Coaches And Players
  | publisher =Tuxedo Press
  | date =May 1, 2007
  | location =Carlisle, PA
  | pages =194–199
  | isbn = 978-0-9774486-4-7}}</ref>
The single-wing formation was a deceptive formation with spectators, referees, and defensive players often losing sight of the ball. A backfield player, called a "spinner", might turn 360 degrees while faking the ball to the other backs, or even keeping the ball or passing it. Defensive players were often fooled as to which back was carrying the ball.<ref>{{Cite web | url=http://www.la84foundation.org/SportsLibrary/CFHSN/CFHSNv11/CFHSNv11n2e.pdf |title = CONTENTdm}}</ref>

[[File:Single-wing punt formation.GIF|thumb|Single-wing punt formation similar to [[Pop Warner]]'s playbook]]
The one play that was unique to the single-wing formation was the [[buck-lateral series]]. The terminology for this series of plays associates the word "buck" with the intent of the fullback to plunge into the line. In addition, the short toss, or lateral of the ball, can be made to the quarterback or wingback who may take the ball and do other maneuvers including passing the ball. Consequently, when the fullback takes the ball, he appears to be headed to buck the line. Typically, fullbacks were larger players that ran plays intended to smash the defensive front. The fullback's initial move pulls the defensive players toward the expected point of attack. Next, the fullback tosses the ball to another back causing the defense to change pursuit angles, thus losing a step in their catching the ball carrier.
The strong side of the formation, where the extra lineman and wingback lined up, put pressure on the defensive end. Defenses might move extra players to that side or shift the whole defense to compensate. The cut-back play could succeed regardless of how the defense reacted. The cut-back play started like a strong side sweep with offensive guards and quarterback running interference for the tailback. The fullback would fake a smash over the guard hole to occupy the defensive tackles. The play was designed to make the defensive end overreact and try to stay outside to contain the runner. If the defensive end gave ground to the sideline, the tailback would cut-back inside to let his interference push the defensive end out of the play. If the defensive end came too far inside, then the ball carrier would run around him to the outside. After the cut-back play was used in a game, then the offense might run the wingback reverse since both plays started out the same way. At the outset, the defense tries to pursue the sweeping tailback. However, the tailback delivers the ball to the wingback running the opposite way to the weak side. Both the cut-back and the reverse would be set up with quick fullback bucks up the middle, which would cause the defensive line to over-protect their gaps, as opposed to pursuing quickly to the sideline.<ref name=autogenerated1 />

Single-wing teams used both a standard punting formation and a quick punt, often kicking on second or third downs. The quick punt, or quick kick, saw the tailback-punter swiftly backing up 5 yards as the ball was in the air from the center to distance himself from rushers. The strategy was to prevent defensive halfbacks, expecting a possession play, from dropping back to return the ball. The standard punt formation was often used for either punting as well as running or passing the ball. Most teams had a litany of plays that they might run from a punt formation.<ref>{{cite book
  | last =Warner
  | first =Glenn
  | title =Football For Coaches And Players
  | publisher =Tuxedo Press
  | date =May 1, 2007
  | location =Carlisle, PA
  | pages =172–185
  | isbn = 978-0-9774486-4-7}}</ref>
[[File:Melon football plus modern football.JPG|thumb|left|200px|The single-wing melon-shaped ball measures from {{cvt|28|to|22|in}} in circumference, while the modern ball measures approximately {{cvt|21|in}}]]
Prior to 1930, the shape of the football was a prominent oval shape called a [[prolate spheroid]]. Due to the shape of the ball, single-wing backs handled the ball more like a basketball, with short tosses and underhand lobs. Gradually, balls were allowed to be elongated enough to produce streamlined passes with a spiral. The spiraled ball could be thrown further with more accuracy, thus increasing the potential for offenses to use the forward pass more frequently.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.footballencyclopedia.com/cfeintro.htm|title=College Football Encyclopedia - Introduction<!-- Bot generated title -->|website=footballencyclopedia.com|access-date=8 April 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081210093200/http://www.footballencyclopedia.com/cfeintro.htm|archive-date=10 December 2008}}</ref>

The single-wing quarterback played a different role than modern-day quarterbacks. While the quarterback may have called the snap count due to his position close to the center of the formation, he may not have called the actual play in the huddle. For much of the history of football, coaches were not allowed to call plays from the sideline. This responsibility may have gone to the team captain. The quarterback was expected to be an excellent blocker at the point of attack. Some playbooks referred to this player as the blocking back. The quarterback also had to handle the ball by faking, handing off, or optioning to other backs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huskerpedia.com/interviews/Pete_Elliott.html|title=Pete Elliott Interview}}</ref>