Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Spoiler effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== First-preference plurality === In cases where there are many similar candidates, spoiler effects occur most often in [[First-preference plurality|first-preference plurality (FPP)]].{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} For example, in the United States, vote splitting is common in [[primary elections|primaries]], where many similar candidates run against each other. The purpose of a primary election is to eliminate vote splitting among candidates from the same party in the [[general election]] by running only one candidate. In a two-party system, party primaries effectively turn [[First-preference plurality|FPP]] into a [[two-round system]].<ref name="Santucci">{{Cite web |last1=Santucci |first1=Jack |last2=Shugart |first2=Matthew |last3=Latner |first3=Michael S. |date=2023-10-16 |title=Toward a Different Kind of Party Government |url=https://protectdemocracy.org/work/toward-a-different-kind-of-party-government/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240716205506/https://protectdemocracy.org/work/toward-a-different-kind-of-party-government/ |archive-date=2024-07-16 |access-date=2024-07-16 |website=Protect Democracy |language=en-US |quote="Finally, we should not discount the role of primaries. When we look at the range of countries with [[first-past-the-post]] (FPTP) elections (given no primaries), none with an assembly larger than Jamaica’s (63) has a strict two-party system. These countries include the [[United Kingdom]] and [[Canada]] (where multiparty competition is in fact nationwide). Whether the U.S. should be called ‘FPTP’ itself is dubious, and not only because some states (e.g. [[Georgia (US State)|Georgia]]) hold runoffs or use the [[alternative vote]] (e.g. [[Maine]]). '''Rather, the U.S. has an unusual two-round system in which the first round winnows the field. This usually is at the intraparty level, although sometimes it is without regard to party (e.g. in Alaska and California).'''"}}</ref><ref name="Gallagher">{{Cite book |last1=Gallagher |first1=Michael |title=The Politics of Electoral Systems |last2=Mitchell |first2=Paul |date=2005-09-15 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-153151-4 |page=192 |language=en |chapter=The American Electoral System |quote="American elections become a two-round run-off system with a delay of several months between the rounds." |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Igdj1P4vBwMC&q=%22American+elections+become+a+two-round+run-off+system+with+a+delay+of+several+months+between+the+rounds.%22&pg=PA3}}</ref><ref name="Bowler">{{Citation |last1=Bowler |first1=Shaun |title=The United States: A Case of Duvergerian Equilibrium |date=2009 |work=Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom and the United States |pages=135–146 |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-09720-6_9 |access-date=2024-08-31 |place=New York, NY |publisher=Springer |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-0-387-09720-6_9 |isbn=978-0-387-09720-6 |quote=In effect, the primary system means that the USA has a two-round runoff system of elections. |last2=Grofman |first2=Bernard |last3=Blais |first3=André|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Vote splitting is the most common cause of spoiler effects in [[First-past-the-post voting|FPP]]. In these systems, the presence of many ideologically-similar candidates causes their vote total to be split between them, placing these candidates at a disadvantage.<ref name="King">{{Cite book |last1=King |first1=Bridgett A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-bCJDAAAQBAJ |title=Why Don't Americans Vote? Causes and Consequences: Causes and Consequences |last2=Hale |first2=Kathleen |date=2016-07-11 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=9781440841163 |language=en |quote=Those votes that are cast for minor party candidates are perceived as taking away pivotal votes from major party candidates. ... This phenomenon is known as the 'spoiler effect'.}}</ref><ref name="Sen-2017">{{cite news |last1=Sen |first1=Amartya |last2=Maskin |first2=Eric |date=2017-06-08 |title=A Better Way to Choose Presidents |url=https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/maskin/files/the_new_york_review_of_books_-_a_better_way_to_choose_presidents_e._maskin_a._sen_.pdf |access-date=2019-07-20 |journal=New York Review of Books |language=en |issn=0028-7504 |quote=plurality-rule voting is seriously vulnerable to vote-splitting ... runoff voting ... as French history shows, it too is highly subject to vote-splitting. ... [Condorcet] majority rule avoids such vote-splitting debacles because it allows voters to rank the candidates and candidates are compared pairwise}}</ref> This is most visible in elections where a minor candidate draws votes away from a major candidate with similar politics, thereby causing a strong opponent of both to win.<ref name="King" /><ref name="Buchler">{{Cite book |last=Buchler |first=Justin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9bzmTImCLfgC |title=Hiring and Firing Public Officials: Rethinking the Purpose of Elections |date=2011-04-20 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=9780199759965 |language=en |quote=a spoiler effect occurs when entry by a third-party candidate causes party A to defeat party B even though Party B would have won in a two-candidate race.}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)