Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Symbolic link
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Error handling=== A traditional [[Unix filesystem]] has a tree structure,<ref name="Ritchie">{{cite journal |last1=Ritchie |first1=D.M. |author-link1=Dennis Ritchie |last2=Thompson |first2=K. |author-link2=Ken Thompson |title=The UNIX Time-Sharing System |journal=Bell System Tech. J. |volume=57 |issue=6 |pages=1905β1929 |date= July 1978 |doi=10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02136.x |citeseerx=10.1.1.112.595}}</ref> however symbolic links allow it to contain loops.<ref name=":0"/> <!-- ELOOP is the current approach but I used a MicroSoft Xenix which tried to do symlink loop detection at symlink creation time as opposed to runtime. Naturally you could create two file systems each with a non-looping symlink and then mount them to align those symlinks into a loop and hang program that tried to open them. I don't know the origin of that bug yet. I have found that there is no sign of BSD code in SCCS that has symlinks while lacking ELOOP. Tested with: "sccsdiff -u -r4.8 -r4.9 SCCS/s.ufs_nami.c" That leaves either the Xenix bug being written by someone at MS or something MS bought. Come to think of it, maybe BSD wasn't the first UNIX to have symlinks added to it. -->
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)