Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Taylor rule
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Alternative versions== [[File:Taylor Rule Prescriptions for Fed Funds Rate 2016.png|thumb|350px|right|Effective federal funds rate and prescriptions from alternate versions of the Taylor Rule]] While the Taylor principle has proven influential, debate remains about what else the rule should incorporate. According to some [[New Keynesian economics|New Keynesian]] macroeconomic models, insofar as the central bank keeps inflation stable, the degree of fluctuation in output will be optimized (economists [[Olivier Blanchard]] and [[Jordi Gali]] call this property the '[[divine coincidence]]'). In this case, the central bank does not need to take fluctuations in the output gap into account when setting interest rates (that is, it may optimally set <math>a_y=0</math>.) Other economists proposed adding terms to the Taylor rule to take into account financial conditions: for example, the interest rate might be raised when stock prices, housing prices, or interest rate spreads increase. Taylor offered a modified rule in 1999: that specified <math>a_{\pi} = 0.5, a_y \ge 0</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)