Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Uniform boundedness principle
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Generalizations== In a [[topological vector space]] (TVS) <math>X,</math> "bounded subset" refers specifically to the notion of a [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|von Neumann bounded subset]]. If <math>X</math> happens to also be a normed or [[seminormed space]], say with [[Seminorm|(semi)norm]] <math>\|\cdot\|,</math> then a subset <math>B</math> is (von Neumann) bounded if and only if it is {{em|norm bounded}}, which by definition means <math display="inline">\sup_{b \in B} \|b\| < \infty.</math> ===Barrelled spaces=== {{Main|Barrelled space}} Attempts to find classes of [[locally convex topological vector space]]s on which the uniform boundedness principle holds eventually led to [[barrelled space]]s. That is, the least restrictive setting for the uniform boundedness principle is a barrelled space, where the following generalized version of the theorem holds {{harv|Bourbaki|1987|loc=Theorem III.2.1}}: {{math theorem |math_statement= Given a barrelled space <math>X</math> and a [[Locally convex topological vector space|locally convex space]] <math>Y,</math> then any family of pointwise bounded [[continuous linear mapping]]s from <math>X</math> to <math>Y</math> is [[equicontinuous]] (and even [[uniformly equicontinuous]]). Alternatively, the statement also holds whenever <math>X</math> is a [[Baire space]] and <math>Y</math> is a locally convex space.{{sfn|Shtern|2001}} }} ===Uniform boundedness in topological vector spaces=== {{Main|Uniformly bounded sets (topological vector space)}} A [[Family of sets|family]] <math>\mathcal{B}</math> of subsets of a [[topological vector space]] <math>Y</math> is said to be {{em|[[Uniformly bounded sets (topological vector space)|uniformly bounded]]}} in <math>Y,</math> if there exists some [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded subset]] <math>D</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math display=block>B \subseteq D \quad \text{ for every } B \in \mathcal{B},</math> which happens if and only if <math display=block>\bigcup_{B \in \mathcal{B}} B</math> is a bounded subset of <math>Y</math>; if <math>Y</math> is a [[normed space]] then this happens if and only if there exists some real <math>M \geq 0</math> such that <math display="inline">\sup_{\stackrel{b \in B}{B \in \mathcal{B}}} \|b\| \leq M.</math> In particular, if <math>H</math> is a family of maps from <math>X</math> to <math>Y</math> and if <math>C \subseteq X</math> then the family <math>\{h(C) : h \in H\}</math> is uniformly bounded in <math>Y</math> if and only if there exists some bounded subset <math>D</math> of <math>Y</math> such that <math>h(C) \subseteq D \text{ for all } h \in H,</math> which happens if and only if <math display=inline>H(C) := \bigcup_{h \in H} h(C)</math> is a bounded subset of <math>Y.</math> {{math theorem | name = Proposition{{sfn|Rudin|1991|pp=42−47}} | math_statement= Let <math>H \subseteq L(X, Y)</math> be a set of continuous linear operators between two [[topological vector space]]s <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> and let <math>C \subseteq X</math> be any [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded subset]] of <math>X.</math> Then the [[family of sets]] <math>\{h(C) : h \in H\}</math> is uniformly bounded in <math>Y</math> if any of the following conditions are satisfied: # <math>H</math> is equicontinuous. # <math>C</math> is a [[Convex set|convex]] [[Compact space|compact]] Hausdorff [[Subspace (topology)|subspace]] of <math>X</math> and for every <math>c \in C,</math> the orbit <math>H(c) := \{h(c) : h \in H\}</math> is a bounded subset of <math>Y.</math> }} ===Generalizations involving nonmeager subsets=== Although the notion of a [[nonmeager set]] is used in the following version of the uniform bounded principle, the domain <math>X</math> is {{em|not}} assumed to be a [[Baire space]]. {{math theorem | name = Theorem{{sfn|Rudin|1991|pp=42−47}} | math_statement= Let <math>H \subseteq L(X, Y)</math> be a set of [[continuous linear operator]]s between two [[topological vector space]]s <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> (not necessarily [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] or locally convex). For every <math>x \in X,</math> denote the [[Orbit (group theory)|orbit]] of <math>x</math> by <math display=block>H(x) := \{h(x) : h \in H\}</math> and let <math>B</math> denote the set of all <math>x \in X</math> whose orbit <math>H(x)</math> is a [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded subset]] of <math>Y.</math> If <math>B</math> is of the [[second category]] (that is, nonmeager) in <math>X</math> then <math>B = X</math> and <math>H</math> is equicontinuous. }} Every proper vector subspace of a TVS <math>X</math> has an empty interior in <math>X.</math>{{sfn|Rudin|1991|p=46}} So in particular, every proper vector subspace that is closed is nowhere dense in <math>X</math> and thus of the first category (meager) in <math>X</math> (and the same is thus also true of all its subsets). Consequently, any vector subspace of a TVS <math>X</math> that is of the second category (nonmeager) in <math>X</math> must be a [[Dense set|dense subset]] of <math>X</math> (since otherwise its closure in <math>X</math> would a closed proper vector subspace of <math>X</math> and thus of the first category).{{sfn|Rudin|1991|p=46}} {{math proof | title = Proof{{sfn|Rudin|1991|pp=42−47}} | proof = {{em|Proof that <math>H</math> is equicontinuous:}} Let <math>W, V \subseteq Y</math> be [[Balanced set|balanced]] neighborhoods of the origin in <math>Y</math> satisfying <math>\overline{V} + \overline{V} \subseteq W.</math> It must be shown that there exists a neighborhood <math>N \subseteq X</math> of the origin in <math>X</math> such that <math>h(N) \subseteq W</math> for every <math>h \in H.</math> Let <math display=block>C ~:=~ \bigcap_{h \in H} h^{-1}\left(\overline{V}\right),</math> which is a closed subset of <math>X</math> (because it is an intersection of closed subsets) that for every <math>h \in H,</math> also satisfies <math>h(C) \subseteq \overline{V}</math> and <math display=block>h(C - C) ~=~ h(C) - h(C) ~\subseteq~ \overline{V} - \overline{V} ~=~ \overline{V} + \overline{V} ~\subseteq~ W</math> (as will be shown, the set <math>C - C</math> is in fact a neighborhood of the origin in <math>X</math> because the topological interior of <math>C</math> in <math>X</math> is not empty). If <math>b \in B</math> then <math>H(b)</math> being bounded in <math>Y</math> implies that there exists some integer <math>n \in \N</math> such that <math>H(b) \subseteq n V</math> so if <math>h \in H,</math> then <math>b ~\in~ h^{-1}\left(n V\right) ~=~ n h^{-1}(V).</math> Since <math>h \in H</math> was arbitrary, <math display=block>b ~\in~ \bigcap_{h \in H} nh^{-1}(V) ~=~ n \bigcap_{h \in H} h^{-1}(V) ~\subseteq~ n C.</math> This proves that <math display=block>B ~\subseteq~ \bigcup_{n \in \N} n C.</math> Because <math>B</math> is of the second category in <math>X,</math> the same must be true of at least one of the sets <math>n C</math> for some <math>n \in \N.</math> The map <math>X \to X</math> defined by <math display="inline">x \mapsto \frac{1}{n} x</math> is a ([[Surjective function|surjective]]) [[homeomorphism]], so the set <math display="inline">\frac{1}{n} (n C) = C</math> is necessarily of the second category in <math>X.</math> Because <math>C</math> is closed and of the second category in <math>X,</math> its [[topological interior]] in <math>X</math> is not empty. Pick <math>c \in \operatorname{Int}_X C.</math> Because the map <math>X \to X</math> defined by <math>x \mapsto c - x</math> is a homeomorphism, the set <math display=block>N ~:=~ c - \operatorname{Int}_X C ~=~ \operatorname{Int}_X (c - C)</math> is a neighborhood of <math>0 = c - c</math> in <math>X,</math> which implies that the same is true of its superset <math>C - C.</math> And so for every <math>h \in H,</math> <math display=block>h(N) ~\subseteq~ h(c - C) ~=~ h(c) - h(C) ~\subseteq~ \overline{V} - \overline{V} ~\subseteq~ W.</math> This proves that <math>H</math> is equicontinuous. Q.E.D. {{hr|1}} {{em|Proof that <math>B = X</math>:}} Because <math>H</math> is equicontinuous, if <math>S \subseteq X</math> is bounded in <math>X</math> then <math>H(S)</math> is uniformly bounded in <math>Y.</math> In particular, for any <math>x \in X,</math> because <math>S := \{x\}</math> is a bounded subset of <math>X,</math> <math>H(\{x\}) = H(x)</math> is a uniformly bounded subset of <math>Y.</math> Thus <math>B = X.</math> Q.E.D. }} ===Sequences of continuous linear maps=== The following theorem establishes conditions for the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous linear maps to be itself continuous. {{math theorem | name = Theorem{{sfn|Rudin|1991|pp=45−46}} | math_statement= Suppose that <math>h_1, h_2, \ldots</math> is a sequence of continuous linear maps between two [[topological vector space]]s <math>X</math> and <math>Y.</math> # If the set <math>C</math> of all <math>x \in X</math> for which <math>h_1(x), h_2(x), \ldots</math> is a Cauchy sequence in <math>Y</math> is of the second category in <math>X,</math> then <math>C = X.</math> # If the set <math>L</math> of all <math>x \in X</math> at which the limit <math>h(x) := \lim_{n \to \infty} h_n(x)</math> exists in <math>Y</math> is of the second category in <math>X</math> and if <math>Y</math> is a [[Complete topological vector space|complete]] [[metrizable topological vector space]] (such as a [[Fréchet space]] or an [[F-space]]), then <math>L = X</math> and <math>h : X \to Y</math> is a continuous linear map. }} {{math theorem | name = Theorem{{sfn|Rudin|1991|p=46}} | math_statement= If <math>h_1, h_2, \ldots</math> is a sequence of continuous linear maps from an [[F-space]] <math>X</math> into a Hausdorff topological vector space <math>Y</math> such that for every <math>x \in X,</math> the limit <math display=block>h(x) ~:=~ \lim_{n \to \infty} h_n(x)</math> exists in <math>Y,</math> then <math>h : X \to Y</math> is a continuous linear map and the maps <math>h, h_1, h_2, \ldots</math> are equicontinuous. }} If in addition the domain is a [[Banach space]] and the codomain is a [[normed space]] then <math>\|h\| \leq \liminf_{n \to \infty} \left\|h_n\right\| < \infty.</math> ====Complete metrizable domain==== {{harvtxt|Dieudonné|1970}} proves a weaker form of this theorem with [[Fréchet space]]s rather than the usual Banach spaces. {{math theorem| name = Theorem{{sfn|Rudin|1991|pp=42−47}} | math_statement= Let <math>H \subseteq L(X, Y)</math> be a set of continuous linear operators from a [[Complete topological vector space|complete]] [[metrizable topological vector space]] <math>X</math> (such as a [[Fréchet space]] or an [[F-space]]) into a [[Hausdorff space|Hausdorff]] [[topological vector space]] <math>Y.</math> If for every <math>x \in X,</math> the [[Orbit (group theory)|orbit]] <math display=block>H(x) := \{h(x) : h \in H\}</math> is a [[Bounded set (topological vector space)|bounded subset]] of <math>Y</math> then <math>H</math> is equicontinuous. So in particular, if <math>Y</math> is also a [[normed space]] and if <math display=block>\sup_{h \in H} \|h(x)\| < \infty \quad \text{ for every } x \in X,</math> then <math>H</math> is equicontinuous. }}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)