Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Unitary group
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 2-out-of-3 property === The unitary group is the 3-fold intersection of the [[orthogonal group|orthogonal]], [[linear complex structure|complex]], and [[symplectic group|symplectic]] groups: : <math>\operatorname{U}(n) = \operatorname{O}(2n) \cap \operatorname{GL}(n, \mathbf{C}) \cap \operatorname{Sp}(2n, \mathbf{R}) .</math> Thus a unitary structure can be seen as an orthogonal structure, a complex structure, and a symplectic structure, which are required to be ''compatible'' (meaning that one uses the same ''J'' in the complex structure and the symplectic form, and that this ''J'' is orthogonal; writing all the groups as matrix groups fixes a ''J'' (which is orthogonal) and ensures compatibility). In fact, it is the intersection of any ''two'' of these three; thus a compatible orthogonal and complex structure induce a symplectic structure, and so forth.<ref>{{cite book |last=Arnold |first=V.I. |title=Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics |url=https://archive.org/details/mathematicalmeth00arno_565 |url-access=limited |publisher=Springer |edition=Second |year=1989 |page=[https://archive.org/details/mathematicalmeth00arno_565/page/n238 225]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/symplectic.html |title=Symplectic, Quaternionic, Fermionic |last=Baez |first=John |access-date=1 February 2012}}</ref> At the level of equations, this can be seen as follows: : <math>\begin{array}{r|r} \text{Symplectic} & A^\mathsf{T}JA = J \\ \hline \text{Complex} & A^{-1}JA = J \\ \hline \text{Orthogonal} & A^\mathsf{T} = A^{-1} \end{array}</math> Any two of these equations implies the third. At the level of forms, this can be seen by decomposing a Hermitian form into its real and imaginary parts: the real part is symmetric (orthogonal), and the imaginary part is skew-symmetric (symplectic)—and these are related by the complex structure (which is the compatibility). On an [[almost Kähler manifold]], one can write this decomposition as {{nowrap|1=''h'' = ''g'' + ''iω''}}, where ''h'' is the Hermitian form, ''g'' is the [[Riemannian metric]], ''i'' is the [[almost complex manifold|almost complex structure]], and ''ω'' is the [[almost symplectic manifold|almost symplectic structure]]. From the point of view of [[Lie group]]s, this can partly be explained as follows: O(2''n'') is the [[maximal compact subgroup]] of {{nowrap|GL(2''n'', '''R''')}}, and U(''n'') is the maximal compact subgroup of both {{nowrap|GL(''n'', '''C''')}} and Sp(2''n''). Thus the intersection {{nowrap|O(2''n'') ∩ GL(''n'', '''C''')}} or {{nowrap|O(2''n'') ∩ Sp(2''n'')}} is the maximal compact subgroup of both of these, so U(''n''). From this perspective, what is unexpected is the intersection {{nowrap|1=GL(''n'', '''C''') ∩ Sp(2''n'') = U(''n'')}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)