Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Unitary representation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Unitarizability and the unitary dual question== In general, for non-compact groups, it is a more serious question which representations are unitarizable. One of the important unsolved problems in mathematics is the description of the '''unitary dual''', the effective classification of irreducible unitary representations of all real [[Reductive group|reductive]] [[Lie group]]s. All [[Irreducible representation|irreducible]] unitary representations are [[Admissible representation|admissible]] (or rather their [[Harish-Chandra module]]s are), and the admissible representations are given by the [[Langlands classification]], and it is easy to tell which of them have a non-trivial invariant [[sesquilinear form]]. The problem is that it is in general hard to tell when the quadratic form is [[Definite quadratic form|positive definite]]. For many reductive Lie groups this has been solved; see [[representation theory of SL2(R)]] and [[representation theory of the Lorentz group]] for examples.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)