Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Veblen good
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Related concepts == [[Image:ROEDERER BOUTEILLE+COFFRET CRISTAL BRUT 2007 750ML V2 RVB.jpg|thumb|right|Expensive [[Champagne]] is an example of a consumable Veblen good.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-wine-011608.html|title=Price tag can change the way people experience wine, study shows|website=news-service.stanford.edu|date=2008-01-15}}</ref>]] The Veblen effect is one of a family of theoretical anomalies in the general [[law of demand]] in [[microeconomics]]. Related effects include: [[File:RolexDaytona.jpg|thumb|right|The stainless steel [[Rolex Daytona]] frequently sells for over its list price]] * The [[snob effect]]: expressed preference for goods because they are different from those commonly preferred; in other words, the demand for a certain good by individuals of a higher income level is inversely related to its demand by those of a lower income level.<ref>{{cite book| last1 = Galatin| first1 = M.| last2 = Leiter| first2 = Robert D.| title = Economics of Information| year = 1981| publisher = Martinus Nijhoff| location = Boston| isbn = 978-0-89838-067-5| pages = [https://archive.org/details/economicsofinfor0000unse_e0f1/page/25 25β29]| url = https://archive.org/details/economicsofinfor0000unse_e0f1/page/25}}</ref> * The [[common law of business balance]]: the low price of a good is believed by many to indicate that the producer may have compromised quality, that is, "you get what you pay for". * The [[Hot hand|hot-hand fallacy]]: stock buyers have fallen prey to the fallacy that previous price increases suggest future price increases.<ref name="Johnson2005"> {{cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Joseph|author2=Tellis, G.J. |author3=Macinnis, D.J. |title=Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades|journal=Journal of Consumer Research|year=2005|volume=2|issue=32|pages=324β329|doi=10.1086/432241|s2cid=145211986}}</ref> Other rationales for buying a high-priced stock are that previous buyers who bid up the price are proof of the issue's quality, or conversely, that an issue's low price may be evidence of viability problems.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)