Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Von Neumann bicommutant theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Proof of (iii)=== Fix {{math|''X'' β '''M'''β²β²}}. We must show that {{math|''X'' β cl<sub>''S''</sub>('''M''')}}, i.e. for each ''h'' β ''H'' and any {{math|''Ξ΅'' > 0}}, there exists ''T'' in {{math|'''M'''}} with {{math|{{!!}}''Xh'' β ''Th''{{!!}} < ''Ξ΅''}}. Fix ''h'' in {{mvar|H}}. The [[Cyclic subspace | cyclic subspace]] {{math|'''M'''''h'' {{=}} {''Mh'' : ''M'' β '''M'''}}} is invariant under the action of any ''T'' in {{math|'''M'''}}. Its [[Closure (topology)|closure]] {{math|cl('''M'''''h'')}} in the norm of ''H'' is a closed linear subspace, with corresponding [[orthogonal projection]] {{mvar|P}} : ''H'' β {{math|cl('''M'''''h'')}} in ''L''(''H''). In fact, this ''P'' is in {{math|'''M'''β²}}, as we now show. :'''Lemma.''' {{math|''P'' β '''M'''β²}}. :'''Proof.''' Fix {{math|''x'' β ''H''}}. As {{math|''Px'' β cl('''M'''''h'')}}, it is the limit of a sequence {{mvar|O<sub>n</sub>h}} with {{mvar|O<sub>n</sub>}} in {{math|'''M'''}}. For any {{math|''T'' β '''M'''}}, {{mvar|TO<sub>n</sub>h}} is also in {{math|'''M'''''h''}}, and by the continuity of {{mvar|T}}, this sequence converges to {{mvar|TPx}}. So {{math|''TPx'' β cl('''M'''''h'')}}, and hence ''PTPx'' = ''TPx''. Since ''x'' was arbitrary, we have ''PTP'' = ''TP'' for all {{mvar|T}} in {{math|'''M'''}}. :Since {{math|'''M'''}} is closed under the adjoint operation and ''P'' is [[self-adjoint operator|self-adjoint]], for any {{math|''x'', ''y'' β ''H''}} we have ::<math>\langle x,TPy\rangle = \langle x,PTPy\rangle = \langle (PTP)^*x,y\rangle = \langle PT^*Px,y\rangle = \langle T^*Px,y\rangle = \langle Px,Ty\rangle = \langle x,PTy\rangle</math> :So ''TP'' = ''PT'' for all {{math|''T'' β '''M'''}}, meaning ''P'' lies in {{math|'''M'''β²}}. By definition of the [[bicommutant]], we must have ''XP'' = ''PX''. Since {{math|'''M'''}} is unital, {{math|''h'' β '''M'''''h''}}, and so {{math| ''h'' {{=}} ''Ph''}}. Hence {{math|''Xh'' {{=}} ''XPh'' {{=}} ''PXh'' β cl('''M'''''h'')}}. So for each {{math|''Ξ΅'' > 0}}, there exists ''T'' in {{math|'''M'''}} with {{math|{{!!}}''Xh'' β ''Th''{{!!}} < ''Ξ΅''}}, i.e. {{mvar|X}} is in the strong operator closure of {{math|'''M'''}}.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)