Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Voodoo Science
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Warning signs== Drawing on examples used in ''Voodoo Science'', Park outlined seven warning signs that a claim may be pseudoscientific in a 2003 article for ''[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]'':<ref>Robert L. Park. (2003). [http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/signs.html "Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science"]. ''[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]''.</ref> # Discoverers make their claims directly to the popular media, rather than to fellow scientists. # Discoverers claim that a [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy]] has tried to suppress the discovery. # The claimed effect appears so weak that observers can hardly distinguish it from [[Signal noise|noise]]. No amount of further work increases the signal. # [[Anecdotal evidence]] is used to back up the claim. # [[True-believer syndrome|True believers]] cite ancient traditions in support of the new claim. # The discoverer or discoverers work in isolation from the mainstream [[scientific community]]. # The discovery, if true, would require a change in the understanding of the fundamental laws of nature.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)