Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Well-founded relation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reflexivity== A relation {{mvar|R}} is said to be [[reflexive relation|reflexive]] if {{math|''a'' ''R'' ''a''}} holds for every {{mvar|a}} in the domain of the relation. Every reflexive relation on a nonempty domain has infinite descending chains, because any constant sequence is a descending chain. For example, in the natural numbers with their usual order β€, we have {{nowrap|1 β₯ 1 β₯ 1 β₯ ...}}. To avoid these trivial descending sequences, when working with a partial order β€, it is common to apply the definition of well foundedness (perhaps implicitly) to the alternate relation < defined such that {{math|''a'' < ''b''}} if and only if {{math|''a'' β€ ''b''}} and {{math|''a'' β ''b''}}. More generally, when working with a [[preorder]] β€, it is common to use the relation < defined such that {{math|''a'' < ''b''}} if and only if {{math|''a'' β€ ''b''}} and {{math|''b'' β° ''a''}}. In the context of the natural numbers, this means that the relation <, which is well-founded, is used instead of the relation β€, which is not. In some texts, the definition of a well-founded relation is changed from the definition above to include these conventions.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)