Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Xenocrates
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Epistemology=== Xenocrates made a more definite division between the three departments of philosophy, than [[Speusippus]],<ref>Sextus Empiricus, ''adv. Math.'' vii. 16</ref> but at the same time abandoned Plato's heuristic method of conducting through doubts ({{transliteration|grc|aporiai}}), and adopted instead a mode of bringing forward his doctrines in which they were developed dogmatically.<ref>{{harvnb|Laërtius|1925|loc=§ 11, 16}}</ref> Xenocrates recognized three grades of cognition, each appropriated to a region of its own: knowledge, sensation, and opinion. He referred knowledge ({{transliteration|grc|episteme}}) to that essence which is the object of pure thought, and is not included in the phenomenal world; sensation ({{transliteration|grc|aisthesis}}) to that which passes into the world of phenomena; opinion ({{transliteration|grc|doxa}}) to that essence which is at once the object of sensuous perception, and, mathematically, of pure reason - the essence of [[heaven]] or the [[star]]s; so that he conceived of {{transliteration|grc|doxa}} in a higher sense, and endeavored, more definitely than Plato, to exhibit mathematics as mediating between knowledge and sensuous perception.<ref>Sextus Empiricus, ''adv. Math.'' vii. 147, etc.</ref> All three modes of apprehension partake of truth; but in what manner scientific perception ({{transliteration|grc|epistemonike aisthesis}}) did so, we unfortunately do not learn. Even here Xenocrates's preference for symbolic modes of sensualising or denoting appears: he connected the above three stages of knowledge with the three [[Moirai|Fates]]: [[Atropos]], [[Clotho]], and [[Lachesis (mythology)|Lachesis]]. We know nothing further about the mode in which Xenocrates carried out his [[dialectic]], as it is probable that what was peculiar to [[Aristotelianism|Aristotelian]] logic did not remain unnoticed in it, for it can hardly be doubted that the division of the existent into the absolutely existent, and the relatively existent,<ref>Simplicius, ''in Arist. Categ.'' iii. f. 6, b</ref> attributed to Xenocrates, was opposed to the Aristotelian table of [[Categories (Aristotle)|categories]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)