Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Zero sharp
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Consequences of existence and non-existence == The existence of <math>0^\sharp</math> implies that every [[Uncountable set|uncountable]] [[Cardinal number|cardinal]] in the set-theoretic universe <math>V</math> is an indiscernible in <math>L</math> and satisfies all [[large cardinal]] axioms that are realized in <math>L</math> (such as being [[Ineffable cardinal|totally ineffable]]). It follows that the existence of <math>0^\sharp</math> contradicts the ''[[axiom of constructibility]]'': <math>V=L</math>. If <math>0^\sharp</math> exists, then it is an example of a non-constructible <math>\Delta^1_3</math> set of natural numbers. This is in some sense the simplest possibility for a non-constructible set, since all <math>\Sigma^1_2</math> and <math>\Pi^1_2</math> sets of natural numbers are constructible. On the other hand, if <math>0^\sharp</math> does not exist, then the constructible universe <math>L</math> is the core model—that is, the canonical [[inner model]] that approximates the large cardinal structure of the universe considered. In that case, [[Jensen's covering lemma]] holds: :For every uncountable set <math>x</math> of ordinals there is a constructible <math>y</math> such that <math>x\subset y</math> and <math>y</math> has the same [[cardinality]] as <math>x</math>. This deep result is due to [[Ronald Jensen]]. Using [[forcing (mathematics)|forcing]] it is easy to see that the condition that <math>x</math> is uncountable cannot be removed. For example, consider [[List of forcing notions#Namba forcing|Namba forcing]], that preserves <math>\omega_1</math> and collapses <math>\omega_2</math> to an ordinal of [[cofinality]] <math>\omega</math>. Let <math>G</math> be an <math>\omega</math>-sequence [[cofinal (mathematics)|cofinal]] on <math>\omega_2^L</math> and [[generic filter|generic]] over <math>L</math>. Then no set in <math>L</math> of <math>L</math>-size smaller than <math>\omega_2^L</math> (which is uncountable in <math>V</math>, since <math>\omega_1</math> is preserved) can cover <math>G</math>, since <math>\omega_2</math> is a [[regular cardinal]]. If <math>0^\sharp</math> does not exist, it also follows that the [[singular cardinals hypothesis]] holds.<ref>P. Holy, "[https://www.dmg.tuwien.ac.at/holy/dip.pdf Absoluteness Results in Set Theory]" (2017). Accessed 24 July 2024.</ref><sup>p. 20</sup>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)