Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Text messaging
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Spam === {{Further|Mobile phone spam}} In 2002, an increasing trend towards [[Mobile phone spam|spamming]] mobile phone users through SMS prompted cellular-service carriers to take steps against the practice, before it became a widespread problem. No major spamming incidents involving SMS had been reported {{As of|2007|alt=as of March 2007}}, but the existence of mobile phone spam<ref name="3750 FREEMSG Scam">{{cite web |url=http://www.kathirvel.com/mobile-text-scam-claim-3750-for-the-accident-you-had/ |title=Accident Claim Text Scam |publisher=Kathirvel.com |date=7 July 2010 |access-date=29 March 2012 |archive-date=5 May 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110505082249/http://www.kathirvel.com/mobile-text-scam-claim-3750-for-the-accident-you-had/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> has been noted by industry watchdogs including ''[[Consumer Reports]]'' magazine and the Utility Consumers' Action Network ([http://www.ucan.org/ UCAN]). In 2005, UCAN brought a case against Sprint for spamming its customers and charging $0.10 per text message.<ref name="Sprint spam">{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/21/business/21cells.html?ei=5090&en=90fb11e106a62920&ex=1279598400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print |title=Sprint and Cingular Named in Complaints |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=21 July 2005}}</ref> The case was settled in 2006 with Sprint agreeing not to send customers Sprint advertisements via SMS.<ref name="Sprint spam result">{{cite web|url=http://www.ucan.org/telecommunications/wireless/ucan_sprint_cell_phone_spam_decision_by_cpuc|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070718173609/http://www.ucan.org/telecommunications/wireless/ucan_sprint_cell_phone_spam_decision_by_cpuc|archive-date=18 July 2007 |url-status=dead |title=UCAN report on Sprint SPAM SMS settlement |website=Utility Consumers' Action Network |date=5 October 2006 |access-date=29 March 2012}}</ref> SMS expert Acision (formerly LogicaCMG Telecoms) reported a new type of SMS malice at the end of 2006, noting the first instances of SMiShing (a cousin to e-mail [[phishing]] scams). In SMiShing, users receive SMS messages posing to be from a company, enticing users to phone premium-rate numbers or reply with personal information. Similar concerns were reported by PhonepayPlus, a [[Consumer protection in the United Kingdom|consumer watchdog]] in the United Kingdom, in 2012.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/17489393 |title=Warning over 'scam' that charges users to receive texts |work=bbc.co.uk|date=28 March 2012 |access-date=29 September 2014}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)