Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Defamation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Civil==== While defamation law in most jurisdictions centres on the protection of individuals' dignity or reputation, defamation law in [[France]] is particularly rooted in protecting the privacy of individuals.<ref name=LD>{{cite journal|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0306422014537174|title=Legal Divisions|author=Dominique Mondoloni|journal=Index on Censorship |date=June 2014 |volume=43 |issue=2 |pages=84β87 |doi=10.1177/0306422014537174 |s2cid=147433423 |access-date=25 May 2022|url-access=subscription }}</ref> While the broader scope of the rights protected make defamation cases easier to prove in France than, for example, in England; awards in defamation cases are significantly lower and it is common for courts to award symbolic damages as low as β¬1.<ref name=LD/> Controversially, damages in defamation cases brought by public officials are higher than those brought by ordinary citizens, which has a [[chilling effect]] on criticism of public policy<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/08/france-faces-restrictions-on-free-expression/|title=France: Strict defamation and privacy laws limit free expression|author=Index on Censorship|access-date=25 May 2022|date=19 August 2013}}</ref> While the only statutory defence available under French defamation law is to demonstrate the truth of the defamatory statement in question, a defence that is unavailable in cases involving an individual's personal life; French courts have recognised three additional exceptions:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://ipi.media/in-france-judicial-evolution-in-defamation-cases-protects-work-of-civil-society/|title=In France, judicial evolution in defamation cases protects work of civil society|author=Scott Griffen|publisher=International Press Institute|access-date=25 May 2022|date=25 September 2014|archive-date=3 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303212541/https://ipi.media/in-france-judicial-evolution-in-defamation-cases-protects-work-of-civil-society/|url-status=dead}}</ref> *References to matters over ten years old *References to a person's pardoned or expunged criminal record *A plea of good faith, which may be made if the statement **pursues a legitimate aim **is not driven by animosity or malice **is prudent and measured in presentation **is backed by a serious investigation that dutifully sought to ascertain the truth of the statement.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)