Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Elsevier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Manipulation of bibliometrics === According to the signatories of the [[San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment]] (see also [[Goodhart's law]]), commercial academic publishers benefit from manipulation of [[bibliometrics]] and [[scientometrics]], such as the [[journal impact factor]]. The impact factor, which is often used as a [[Proxy (statistics)|proxy]] of [[Occupational prestige|prestige]], can influence revenues, subscriptions, and academics' willingness to contribute unpaid work.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=McKiernan |first1=Erin C. |last2=Schimanski |first2=Lesley A. |last3=Muñoz Nieves |first3=Carol |last4=Matthias |first4=Lisa |last5=Niles |first5=Meredith T. |last6=Alperin |first6=Juan P. |year=2019 |title=Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations |journal=eLife |volume=8 |doi=10.7554/eLife.47338 |pmc=6668985 |pmid=31364991 |doi-access=free}}</ref> However, there's evidence suggesting that reliability of published research works in several fields may ''decrease'' with increasing journal rank.<ref name="Brembs2018">{{cite journal |vauthors=Brembs B |year=2018 |title=Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability |journal=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |volume=12 |page=37 |doi=10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037 |pmc=5826185 |pmid=29515380 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Nine Elsevier journals, which exhibited unusual levels of [[self-citation]], had their journal impact factor of 2019 suspended from ''[[Journal Citation Reports]]'' in 2020, a sanction that hit 34 journals in total.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Oransky |first1=Ivan |date=29 June 2020 |title=Major indexing service sounds alarm on self-citations by nearly 50 journals |url=https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/29/major-indexing-service-sounds-alarm-on-self-citations-by-nearly-50-journals/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200629225455/https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/29/major-indexing-service-sounds-alarm-on-self-citations-by-nearly-50-journals/ |archive-date=29 June 2020 |access-date=1 July 2020}}</ref> In 2023, the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, which is published by Elsevier, was criticized for desk-rejecting a submitted article for the main reason that it did not cite enough articles from the same journal.<ref name="cen23" /><ref name="singh23" /> One of their journals, ''Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis'', was involved in the manipulation of the peer review report.<ref>{{cite web |last=Raman |first=T. R. Shankar |date=4 April 2021 |title=Why I Won't Review or Write for Elsevier and Other Commercial Scientific Journals |url=https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/why-i-wont-review-or-write-for-elsevier-and-other-commercial-scientific-journals/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211008034601/https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/why-i-wont-review-or-write-for-elsevier-and-other-commercial-scientific-journals/ |archive-date=8 October 2021 |access-date=5 October 2021 |work=[[The Wire (India)|The Wire]] |location=New Delhi, India}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)