Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
International Criminal Court
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Nongovernmental organizations=== During the 1970s and 1980s, international human rights and humanitarian Nongovernmental Organizations (or NGOs) began to proliferate at exponential rates. Concurrently, the quest to find a way to punish international crimes shifted from being the exclusive responsibility of legal experts to being shared with [[international human rights law|international human rights]] activism. NGOs helped birth the ICC through advocacy and championing for the prosecution of perpetrators of crimes against humanity. NGOs closely monitor the organization's declarations and actions, ensuring that the work that is being executed on behalf of the ICC is fulfilling its objectives and responsibilities to civil society.<ref name="Schiff">{{cite book|last=Schiff|first=Benjamin|title=Building the International Criminal Court|year=2008|publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> According to Benjamin Schiff, "From the Statute Conference onward, the relationship between the ICC and the NGOs has probably been closer, more consistent, and more vital to the Court than have analogous relations between NGOs and any other international organization." There are a number of NGOs working on a variety of issues related to the ICC. The NGO [[Coalition for the International Criminal Court]] has served as a sort of umbrella for NGOs to coordinate with each other on similar objectives related to the ICC. The CICC has 2,500 member organizations in 150 countries.<ref name="CICC"> {{cite web|title=About the Coalition|url=http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=coalition|publisher=Coalition for the International Criminal Court|access-date=28 April 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520051604/http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=coalition|archive-date=20 May 2011|url-status=deviated}} </ref> The original steering committee included representatives from the [[World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy|World Federalist Movement]], the [[International Commission of Jurists]], [[Amnesty International]], the [[Lawyers Committee for Human Rights]], [[Human Rights Watch]], [[Parliamentarians for Global Action]], and [[No Peace Without Justice]].<ref name="Schiff"/> Today, many of the NGOs with which the ICC cooperates are members of the CICC. These organizations come from a range of backgrounds, spanning from major international NGOs such as [[Human Rights Watch]] and [[Amnesty International]], to smaller, more local organizations focused on peace and justice missions.<ref name="Schiff"/> Many work closely with states, such as the International Criminal Law Network, founded and predominantly funded by [[the Hague]] municipality and the Dutch Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs. The CICC also claims organizations that are themselves federations, such as the [[International Federation of Human Rights Leagues]] (FIDH). CICC members subscribe to three principles that permit them to work under the umbrella of the CICC, so long as their objectives match them: * Promoting worldwide ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute of the ICC * Maintaining the integrity of the Rome Statute of the ICC, and * Ensuring the ICC will be as fair, effective and independent as possible<ref name="CICC"/> The NGOs that work under the CICC do not normally pursue agendas exclusive to the work of the Court, rather they may work for broader causes, such as general human rights issues, victims' rights, gender rights, rule of law, conflict mediation, and peace.<ref name="Schiff"/><ref>{{Cite book |last=Chappell |first=Louise |chapter=The Role of the ICC in Transitional Gender Justice: Capacity and Limitations |date=2012 |title=Gender in Transitional Justice |pages=37β58 |editor-last=Buckley-Zistel |editor-first=Susanne |series=Governance and Limited Statehood Series |place=London |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK|doi=10.1057/9780230348615_2 |isbn=978-0-230-34861-5 |editor2-last=Stanley |editor2-first=Ruth}}</ref> The CICC coordinates their efforts to improve the efficiency of NGOs' contributions to the Court and to pool their influence on major common issues. From the ICC side, it has been useful to have the CICC channel NGO contacts with the Court so that its officials do not have to interact individually with thousands of separate organizations. NGOs have been crucial to the evolution of the ICC, as they assisted in the creation of the normative climate that urged states to seriously consider the Court's formation. Their legal experts helped shape the Statute, while their lobbying efforts built support for it. They advocate Statute ratification globally and work at expert and political levels within member states for passage of necessary domestic legislation. NGOs are greatly represented at meetings for the [[#Assembly|Assembly of States Parties]], and they use the ASP meetings to press for decisions promoting their priorities.<ref name="Schiff"/> Many of these NGOs have reasonable access to important officials at the ICC because of their involvement during the Statute process. They are engaged in monitoring, commenting upon, and assisting in the ICC's activities. The ICC often depends on NGOs to interact with local populations. The Registry Public Information Office personnel and Victims Participation and Reparations Section officials hold seminars for local leaders, professionals and the media to spread the word about the Court.<ref name="Schiff"/> These are the kinds of events that are often hosted or organized by local NGOs. Because there can be challenges with determining which of these NGOs are legitimate, CICC regional representatives often have the ability to help screen and identify trustworthy organizations. NGOs are also "sources of criticism, exhortation and pressure upon" the ICC.<ref name="Schiff"/> The ICC heavily depends on NGOs for its operations. Although NGOs and states cannot directly impact the judicial nucleus of the organization, they can impart information on crimes, can help locate victims and witnesses, and can promote and organize victim participation. NGOs outwardly comment on the Court's operations, "push for expansion of its activities especially in the new justice areas of outreach in conflict areas, in victims' participation and reparations, and in upholding due-process standards and defense 'equality of arms' and so implicitly set an agenda for the future evolution of the ICC."<ref name="Schiff"/> The relatively uninterrupted progression of NGO involvement with the ICC may mean that NGOs have become repositories of more institutional historical knowledge about the ICC than its national representatives, and have greater expertise than some of the organization's employees themselves. While NGOs look to mold the ICC to satisfy the interests and priorities that they have worked for since the early 1990s, they unavoidably press against the limits imposed upon the ICC by the states that are members of the organization. NGOs can pursue their own mandates, irrespective of whether they are compatible with those of other NGOs, while the ICC must respond to the complexities of its own mandate as well as those of the states and NGOs. Another issue has been that NGOs possess "exaggerated senses of their ownership over the organization and, having been vital to and successful in promoting the Court, were not managing to redefine their roles to permit the Court its necessary independence."<ref name="Schiff"/> Additionally, because there does exist such a gap between the large human rights organizations and the smaller peace-oriented organizations, it is difficult for ICC officials to manage and gratify all of their NGOs. "ICC officials recognize that the NGOs pursue their own agendas, and that they will seek to pressure the ICC in the direction of their own priorities rather than necessarily understanding or being fully sympathetic to the myriad constraints and pressures under which the Court operates."<ref name="Schiff"/> Both the ICC and the NGO community avoid criticizing each other publicly or vehemently, although NGOs have released advisory and cautionary messages regarding the ICC. They avoid taking stances that could potentially give the Court's adversaries, particularly the U.S., more motive to berate the organization.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)