Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Asymptomatic carrier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Asymptomatic bacteriuria == Asymptomatic [[bacteriuria]] is a condition that typically impacts 3β5% of women, with the most vulnerable populations being the elderly and those diagnosed with diabetes.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/SupportingDoc/asymptomatic-bacteriuria-in-adults-screening/evidence-summary11 |title= Evidence Summary: Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: Screening |work= US Preventive Services Task Force |access-date= 2018-11-12 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181113030109/https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/SupportingDoc/asymptomatic-bacteriuria-in-adults-screening/evidence-summary11 |archive-date= 2018-11-13 |url-status= dead }}</ref> Within the female population, the risk of bacteriuria increases with age. ''Escherichia coli'' is the most common organism found during urine analysis, though the variety of potentially infectious organisms is diverse and can include Enterobacteriaceae, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'', Enterococcus species, and group B streptococcus.<ref name=":4">{{cite journal | vauthors = Colgan R, Nicolle LE, McGlone A, Hooton TM | title = Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults | journal = American Family Physician | volume = 74 | issue = 6 | pages = 985β990 | date = September 2006 | pmid = 17002033 | url = http://www.aafp.org/afp/2006/0915/p985.html }}</ref> The [[Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality]] has issued a set of screening recommendations as well as offered some insight into the mechanism of bacteriuria.<ref name=":4" /> Results of the meta-analysis produced no clear explanation for asymptomatic carriage, but did yield new evidence that strengthened the support for screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women only.<ref name=":4" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)