Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Axiom of determinacy
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Large cardinals and the axiom of determinacy == The consistency of the axiom of determinacy is closely related to the question of the consistency of [[large cardinal]] axioms. By a theorem of [[W. Hugh Woodin|Woodin]], the consistency of [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]] without choice (ZF) together with the axiom of determinacy is equivalent to the consistency of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with choice (ZFC) together with the existence of infinitely many [[Woodin cardinal]]s. Since Woodin cardinals are [[inaccessible cardinal|strongly inaccessible]], if AD is consistent, then so are an infinity of inaccessible cardinals. Moreover, if to the hypothesis of an infinite set of Woodin cardinals is added the existence of a [[measurable cardinal]] larger than all of them, a very strong theory of [[Lebesgue measurable]] sets of reals emerges, as it is then provable that the axiom of determinacy is true in [[L(R)]], and therefore that ''every'' set of real numbers in L(R) is determined.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)