Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Banach fixed-point theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Generalizations== There are a number of generalizations (some of which are immediate [[Corollary|corollaries]]).<ref name=Latif2014>{{cite book |first=Abdul |last=Latif |title=Topics in Fixed Point Theory |pages=33β64 |chapter=Banach Contraction Principle and its Generalizations |publisher=Springer |year=2014 |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-01586-6_2 |isbn=978-3-319-01585-9 }}</ref> Let ''T'' : ''X'' β ''X'' be a map on a complete non-empty metric space. Then, for example, some generalizations of the Banach fixed-point theorem are: *Assume that some iterate ''T<sup>n</sup>'' of ''T'' is a contraction. Then ''T'' has a unique fixed point. *Assume that for each ''n'', there exist ''c<sub>n</sub>'' such that ''d''(''T''<sup>''n''</sup>(''x''), ''T''<sup>''n''</sup>(''y'')) β€ ''c''<sub>''n''</sub>''d''(''x'', ''y'') for all ''x'' and ''y'', and that ::<math>\sum\nolimits_n c_n <\infty.</math> :Then ''T'' has a unique fixed point. In applications, the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point often can be shown directly with the standard Banach fixed point theorem, by a suitable choice of the metric that makes the map ''T'' a contraction. Indeed, the above result by Bessaga strongly suggests to look for such a metric. See also the article on [[fixed point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces]] for generalizations. In a non-empty [[compact metric space]], any function <math>T</math> satisfying <math>d(T(x),T(y))<d(x,y)</math> for all distinct <math>x,y</math>, has a unique fixed point. The proof is simpler than the Banach theorem, because the function <math>d(T(x),x)</math> is continuous, and therefore assumes a minimum, which is easily shown to be zero. A different class of generalizations arise from suitable generalizations of the notion of [[metric space]], e.g. by weakening the defining axioms for the notion of metric.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Pascal |last1=Hitzler | author-link1=Pascal Hitzler|first2=Anthony |last2=Seda |title=Mathematical Aspects of Logic Programming Semantics |publisher=Chapman and Hall/CRC |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4398-2961-5 }}</ref> Some of these have applications, e.g., in the theory of programming semantics in theoretical computer science.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Anthony K. |last1=Seda |first2=Pascal |last2=Hitzler | author-link2=Pascal Hitzler|title=Generalized Distance Functions in the Theory of Computation |journal=The Computer Journal |volume=53 |issue=4 |pages=443β464 |year=2010 |doi=10.1093/comjnl/bxm108 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)