Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Behavioral ecology
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Mating strategies and tactics=== As with any [[competition]] of resources, species across the animal kingdom may also engage in competitions for mating. If one considers mates or potentials mates as a resource, these sexual partners can be randomly distributed amongst resource pools within a given environment. Following the ideal free distribution model, suitors distribute themselves amongst the potential mates in an effort to maximize their chances or the number of potential matings. For all competitors, males of a species in most cases, there are variations in both the strategies and tactics used to obtain matings. Strategies generally refer to the genetically determined behaviors that can be described as [[causality|conditional]]. Tactics refer to the subset of behaviors within a given genetic strategy. Thus it is not difficult for a great many variations in mating strategies to exist in a given environment or species.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dominey |first=Wallace |title=Alternative Mating Tactics and Evolutionarily Stable Strategies |journal=American Zoology |year=1984 |volume=24|issue=2|pages=385โ396|doi=10.1093/icb/24.2.385|doi-access=free }}</ref> An experiment conducted by Anthony Arak, where playback of synthetic calls from male [[natterjack toad]]s was used to manipulate behavior of the males in a chorus, the difference between strategies and tactics is clear. While small and immature, male natterjack toads adopted a satellite tactic to parasitize larger males. Though large males on average still retained greater reproductive success, smaller males were able to intercept matings. When the large males of the chorus were removed, smaller males adopted a calling behavior, no longer competing against the loud calls of larger males. When smaller males got larger, and their calls more competitive, then they started calling and competing directly for mates.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Arak|first=Anthony|title=Sexual selection by maleโmale competition in natterjack toad choruses |journal=Nature |year=1983 |volume=306 |issue=5940 |doi=10.1038/306261a0 |pages=261โ262 |bibcode = 1983Natur.306..261A |s2cid=4363873}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)