Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
C7 Sport
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Claim=== Seven's principal claims, relying on anti-competitive provisions in Part IV of the [[Trade Practices Act]], were that: * Foxtel denied C7 access to Telstra's cable network and Foxtel's STBs in order to weaken C7's position when negotiating television deals with the AFL and NRL; * One or more of the named defendants acted illegally to collude in the marketplace and use their combined market power to prevent competition; * Foxtel's owners (Telstra, News Corporation and PBL) signed an agreement in late-1999 to ensure Foxtel gained the AFL and NRL rights. * Optus's undertaking to carry Fox Sports was a breach of an 'exclusive' contract it had with Seven for provision of sports programming. Seven claimed damages of A$480 million (amended from the original A$1.1 billion).<ref>Ryan, Peter. [http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2005/s1469680.htm C7 court case gets personal] [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation|ABC]] radio PM, 27 September 2005. Retrieved 2 September 2014</ref> Soon after the case began, the suits against Network Ten and the AFL were settled in the [[Federal Court of Australia|Federal Court]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)