Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Centralisation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Advantages and disadvantages of the centralisation of authority=== Centralisation of authority has several advantages and disadvantages. The benefits include: # Responsibilities and duties are well defined within the central governing body. # Decision-making is very direct and clear.<ref name=":0">Singh, K. (2015). ''What is Centralization and De-Centralization of the Authority? | Total MBA Guide.'' [online] Mbaofficial.com. Available at: http://www.mbaofficial.com/mba-courses/principles-of-management/what-is-centralization-and-de-centralization-of-the-authority/ [Accessed 4 Nov. 2015].</ref> # The central power maintains a large "encompassing interest" in the welfare of the state it rules since it stands to benefit from any increase in the state's wealth and/or power.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Olson|first=Mancur|date=1993-01-01|title=Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development|jstor=2938736|journal=The American Political Science Review|volume=87|issue=3|pages=567β576|doi=10.2307/2938736|s2cid=145312307 }}</ref> In this sense, the incentives of state and ruler are aligned. Disadvantages, on the other hand are as follows: # Decisions may be misunderstood while being passed on and lower position departments do not have the decision-making power, therefore it requires an efficient and well-organised top department. # Attention and support for each department or city may not be balanced. # Delay of work information may result in inefficiency of the government. # Discrepancies in the economy and information resources between the centre and other places are significant. # Excludes actors at the local and provincial levels from the prevailing system of governance, reducing the capacity of the central government to hold the authority accountable (with risks of corruption), resolve disputes or design effective policies requiring local knowledge and expertise.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sawyer|first=Amos|date=2004-09-01|title=Violent conflicts and governance challenges in West Africa: the case of the Mano River basin area|journal=The Journal of Modern African Studies|volume=42|issue=3|pages=437β463|doi=10.1017/S0022278X04000266|s2cid=154954003|issn=1469-7777}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Shleifer|first=Andrei|date=2002|title=The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures|url=http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674010147}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)