Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Citation signal
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Accord=== "Accord" is used when two or more sources state or support the proposition, but the text quotes (or refers to) only one; the other sources are then introduced by "accord". Legal writers often use ''accord'' to indicate that the law of one jurisdiction is in accord with that of another jurisdiction. Examples: "[N]ervousness alone does not justify extended detention and questioning about matters not related to the stop." ''United States v. Chavez-Valenzuela'', 268 F.3d 719,725 (9th Cir. 2001); ''accord United States v. Beck'', 140 F.3d 1129, 1139 (8th Cir. 1998); ''United States v. Wood'', 106 F.3d 942, 248 (10th Cir. 1997); ''United States v. Tapia'', 912 F.2d 1367, 1370 (11th Cir. 1990). "... The term '[[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Fifth Amendment]]' in the context of our time is commonly regarded as being synonymous with the privilege against self-incrimination". ''Quinn v. United States'', 349 U.S. 155, 163, 75 S. Ct. 668, 99 L. Ed. 964 (1955); ''accord In re Johnny V.'', 85 Cal. App. 3d 120, 149 Cal.Rptr. 180, 184, 188 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978) (holding that the statement "I'll take the fifth" was an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)